|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #11 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 23.07.2009
Сообщений: 5,736
Спасибо: 8,058
Поблагодарили 4,382 раз(а) в 2,259 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 8507
|
Guided by common sense and historical norms of the conventional public morality could be derived from the letter of the main idea, which insist honored figures: the actual art should be separated from the Tretyakov Gallery ..
And another question, whether it is in the museum at all x (in a given place and at this time) must respond to those who pay for it: PEOPLE .. My opinion: If the actual art can exist without the involvement gos.finansov, let them develop and then cooked in a gravy: kontseptualnae artists (producers), buyers (consumers) People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet .. What are you discussing? |
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо NATA NOVA за это полезное сообщение: | Тютчев (26.07.2009) |