Go to fight some old
 

This is an appeal to the Minister of Culture, I discovered today.

Letter Honored Culture Minister of Culture

Dear Alexander!

Worried about the state of the State Tretyakov Gallery - the oldest national museum of fine art, we ask you to intervene to return the gallery of its true value.

Over 150 years of the Tretyakov Gallery was a center of gathering and study of Russian art. Recently, it turned into a representation of the international avant-garde, nothing to do with art is not available.

The forced introduction of its exhibit self-proclaimed "modern art" has significantly changed its appearance and its essence. If the traditional concept mastered the art of his time raising and in artistic form embodying the problems of moral, social, philosophical, etc. nature, the modern avant-garde self-expression and is busy searching for scholastic forms without a goal. This is evidenced absurdist exposition of contemporary art department of the Tretyakov Gallery. Almost without exception, the exhibits of this department do not have the artistic character. The exposition is placed a dirty bathtub, filled with debris, apparently brought from a rubbish heap (by "installation from the bathroom" artist Vinogradov GI). Obviously, the same author offered as an exhibit a wheelbarrow, covered with sawdust. Especially encouraged installation of trash and garbage. Original artist YF Albert presented to the audience four clean holstika on a stretcher, entitled "Self". In times of "not very educated" PM Tretyakov about art to be judged by what is written on the canvas, now you can put a blank canvas to be an artist. On the transfer of V. Erofeev "Apocrypha" on conceptualism, the same Albert was asked how he sees conceptualism in the visual arts. Albert said: "I'm working on the problem from both ekskrimentov create a work of art." There is no doubt that he will master this challenge and then we will distinguish the art of blundering by the smell.

Such "ekskrimentatory" turned the State Tretyakov Gallery in mockery of the art. Obviously
that the "cultural revolution" of its leader, M. Shvydkoy turned the once normal people in popsoidov.

Conductors ideas Shvydkoy: Director of the State Tretyakov Gallery Rodionov, Deputy for Science IV Lebedeva, L. Iovleva, Head. Division A. Erofeev, and other progressives have successfully brought the understanding of art to the absurd. Thus the Western project to destroy the national culture carried out on the material of the so-called department of modern art.

Dear Alexander, Could you return the Tretyakov Gallery in its pristine state? Moreover, the traditional art continues to exist within at least the creative artists of the Union of Russia, which has more than 30 thousand members and is keen interest among the many visitors, though no longer called modern.

Currently in Moscow, there are three museum of contemporary avant-garde creativity. In these circumstances, the simplest solution is seen in the transmission department of modernism GTT, as phenomena do not correspond with the Russian fine art, in the above mentioned museums. This solution would be reasonable, since divided to two opposing phenomena and allow for fine arts, many of them masterpieces, back from the dark storerooms its rightful place in the exposition.

The State Tretyakov Gallery has found to its former importance as a museum of Russian art in full in its history.

It would be useful to return to the century-old practice GTG, when it was led by authoritative representatives of the art world, such, for example, as I.E Grabar, who created a multi-volume history of Russian art, that is not random people, and professionals with deep knowledge of the subject, which they have devoted all his life.



Tutunov AA - People's Artist of Russia;

Kalinin, VG - Member of Russia Academy of Arts;

Tkachev SP - People's artist of USSR, member of the Russia Academy of Arts, State Prize Winner
USSR, the RSFSR and Russia;

Tkachev AP - People's artist of USSR, member of the Russia Academy of Arts, State Prize Winner
USSR, the RSFSR and Russia;

Ivanov VI - People's artist of USSR, member of the Russia Academy of Arts, State Prize Winner
USSR, the RSFSR and Russia;

Stekol'shchikov VK - People's Artist of Russia;

Solomin, NN - People's Artist of Russia, professor, member of the Russia Academy of Arts;

Manin VS - Honored Artist of Russia, Doctor of Arts, Professor;

Žilina DD - People's Artist of Russia, member of the Academy of Arts USSR, laureate of USSR State Prize;

Nimensky BM - People's Artist of Russia, full member of the Russia Academy of Arts;

Zolotussky IP - Doctor of literature, professor;

Rasputin VG - Writer, winner of the State Prize of the USSR;

Bondarev UV - Writer, winner of the State Prize of the USSR;

Solomin YM - People's Artist of the USSR, Artistic Director of the Maly Theater;

Nikoghosyan NB - Sculptor, People's artist of USSR, member of the Russia Academy of Arts

http://www.maslovka.ru/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=906

Your opinion, gentlemen?

There, this "modern art" is not much.

Who knows who, where and what he said ...
No seriously was quoted on TV in a letter to the Minister.
Very much a denunciation.
What's so signers worry? They are well represented in the halls of the State Tretyakov Gallery The Art of the twentieth century. Hanging there as their pictures. : D: D: D
Agrees.
But Rodionov was appointed to the State Tretyakov Gallery, the period of reconstruction. To this task he had mastered and is now retiring.
Appoint specialist candidate already.

This is a controversial letter to the yard .. not 1974.
.. head. Erofeev AV department? It has long been dismissed ..
Director of the State Tretyakov Gallery Rodionov and actual art? What is the connection? too confusing ...

from that taken?
 

Scissors For some reason, can not write is taken from a document where published. Can I find out kaknitt?

To paraphrase, that "what do we read, for it and copied.
(Reread my first sentence in the message)

Document taken from the authors of the letter (signed) and published on the website "Maslovka - a town of artists" - is not that enough ?!!!:)
Those who do not use the Internet can read the letter in the newspaper "Tomorrow" for May number 21 (same source).

Cyril:
1. "not much" is not applicable to debris (ie a definition of a. and-vu give authors of the letter). For them, the temple should not be "a little dirty." And the question will ultimately be put where in principle: why in the museum, which was formed with a definite eye on the art, invades something that is fundamentally antagonistic to this view? If you are an Orthodox Christian, you do not come into his head to go to pray in a mosque or synagogue? Is it not enough places where you can exhibit the "genius"? Or go bad? .. Need untwisted mark, to bask in the glory of the distinguished names? ... "Kohl and Vasya were here!".
2. Albert was interviewed on the channel "Culture", where he was apparently not by chance, was invited. Channel "Culture" patronized by the Ministry of Culture of Russia. Minister - the boss in the ministry, he and explain the aesthetic feature of excrement in the air.

Eugene: The letter was not written about who was "but for the sake of those who" come ", and I must say, concern in the letter was not accidental.

In the department of the twentieth century, the museum should be submitted to all the trends of domestic art.
Spectators vybirut themselves that they like and that there is "garbage."
P. Tretyakov bought pictures, "fresh" made here just now. And too often questionable for today.
Then somehow resulted in a sample comparison of the Cheka Malevich and "Girls, illuminated by the sun" (1888) by Valentin Serov.

I recall that Pavel Tretyakov criticized for obtaining of this painting is the artists.
In 1889, Vladimir Makovsky at the next dinner Wanderers threw Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov defiant phrase: "Since when Pavel, you have to inculcate in your gallery syphilis?".
Was this phrase did not like?

And who asked the audience something? As you see, asking only "geniuses", specialists in shit and pure, unblemished paint to canvas. Or you have noticed the endless line at the Museums "actual" art. The fact of the matter is that without massive, preferably outrageous, scandalous advertising these rotten foot, no one will want to sniff. And so - the higher the level dibilizma spectator, the offer large want to look at ass naked in the subway, or on the rusty batteries, instead of chandeliers hung example. in the Kremlin, etc. new art.
I agree that this kind of art - the art of shocking, but not art. And if so - nothing to do in the gallery of the same name.

It reminds me of the simple truth: only the owner-collector of the right to determine thin. vision of their congregation. The current ideological exposition Tretyakov likened ignorant and as impudent apprentice who tries to write up something on a canvas of Rembrandt.

All clear-sheet, which has always supported the Communists and stalinistov.Kommentirovat no desire ..

We are afraid that it? ..