Go to fight some old

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от LCR

All would be right if people have not paid their finances (about the soul of its opinion do not have) for the development of the art practiced by artists who have signed this letter - in fact, and "deserved" something they have in yet recently, the existing system of state orders, factory, etc.
So "Physician, heal yourself".
Or not?

We can not change the past, we can only correct the present and plan for the future.
Well not ready for people to contemporary art and artists, it seems, creative freedom in his head struck .. It's normal that it should be displayed separately (or not?)

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Eugene

I, too, "the people" and I like nonconformists

I, too, some of them like it. But ... as a theory of denial and disagreement - it is not of life. Negativism any good yet cause ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

It's normal that it should be displayed separately (or not?)

Separately already: "Fuehrer Museum"
Read more:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...p;postcount=21

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Buscador

But ... as a theory of denial and disagreement - it is not of life.

Question of the exhibition in the museum, rather than on the theory of denial and disagreement ....

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

I, too, some of them like it. But ... as a theory of denial and disagreement - it is not of life. Negativism any good yet cause ...

This is about you non-conformists?
A conformism-positivism? Always lead to good?

[LCR]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

We can not change the past, we can only correct the present and plan for the future.
Well not ready for people to contemporary art and artists, it seems, creative freedom in his head struck .. It's normal that it should be displayed separately (or not?)

Do not be so hasty conclusions.

Just last night my guest was a participant of this forum (already on the forum, he seemed to me a very nice, but a complete delight, I must confess, I did not expect!) With his wife and her friend's wife - all three artists. They said that recently their regional government for voting question, do we need a culture of people (makes it possible for the crisis, you know?)? So, imagine a majority of 2 votes, these representatives of the people have decided, despite the crisis, culture, and not to cancel the exhibition to continue to disburse. And you say - the people!

Now, seriously: why is normal for the actual art is exhibited separately? Why the Crimean Tretyakov normally reserve for "deserved"?
After all, Germany has no museum dedicated to the art of III Reich, or in France - Museum, assigned to a work created by order of the Vichy government, why in Russia, one of the major museums in the country should be granted only to representatives of official Soviet art?
If you say this is because the artists, these "people", then you should not delude ourselves oruelovskimi etymological exercises.

P.S. Forum regulars know that to the actual art, I am coolly, but also to the Socialist Realism particular sympathy do not feed.

[NATA NOVA]

I have written somewhere that the actual art is a product of consumer society.
In Russia, a very different historical situation, a different cultural background, and most other priority issues. (Not to fat) .. Why worry about a society torn by social and financial bundle more and this (importing) art .. Yes, let him live and develop-create-bought (in the individual personal gallery) ...
What argument does not understand?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

Now, seriously: why is normal for the actual art is exhibited separately? Why the Crimean Tretyakov normally reserve for "deserved"?
After all, Germany has no museum dedicated to the art of III Reich, or in France - Museum, assigned to a work created by order of the Vichy government, why in Russia, one of the major museums in the country should be granted only to representatives of official Soviet art?
If you say this is because the artists, these "people", then you should not delude ourselves oruelovskimi etymological Exercise.

Sorry, I thought what in the Tretyakov Gallery (that which Tretyakov collected) is a collection of works of "fine art" in general (and Russian mostly) ..
And bind to totalitarianism not quite understand ..

Сообщение от LCR

And you say - the people!

She did not understand the implication ..

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

.. Why worry about a society torn by social and financial bundle more and this (importing) art ..

So you naive soul, think that some "society" in Russia could upset some "imported" art?
This is a view of foggy Albion?
: D: D: D

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от LCR

Do the people of the culture

They refer specifically about contemporary art?
How obdastnoy center called?

[LCR]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

What argument does not understand?

The argument that some portion of Artists Russia, in its time, it is not competent in the USSR, which had a monopoly on the art, can not come to terms with the loss of this monopoly and trying to prevent another part of the Russian artists access to museums, using their usual method of denunciations and insinuations. Now clear?

The theme of the people, perhaps, should be set aside: science, also funded by national (fiscal) means, does not develop a "people", and its individual representatives, have this ability and have received appropriate education. Why do you want to in the art of the situation was different?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Sorry, I thought what in the Tretyakov Gallery (that which Tretyakov collected) is a collection of works of "fine art" in general, (and Russian mostly )..

Only Russian art.
And the second: the conversation is about modern art, which is no longer collected Tretyakov, Sc. Department of Arts of the twentieth century, it is not even in Lavrushensky, but in another building, and at another address.