Go to fight some old

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

So you naive soul, think that some "society" in Russia could upset some "imported" art?
This is a view of foggy Albion?
: D: D: D

And what do we do? Is not worried?
... probably better for me to take pictures to write ... (to be more productive, though satisfaction poimeyu) ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

science, also funded by national (fiscal) means, does not develop a "people", and its individual representatives, have this ability and have received appropriate education. Why do you want to in the art of the situation was different?

In! Sam always comparing himself "aktualschikov with an experimental laboratory.
What is yet to win is not known, but may be sense.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

and yet it (importing) art

Remember who importing something? And when? Art in Russia? : D
No, better not to remember, and then dig up ... : eek:

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от LCR

in his time entirely ineligible in the Soviet Union which had a monopoly on the art, can not come to terms with the loss of this monopoly and trying to prevent another part of the Russian artists access to museums, using their usual method of denunciations and insinuations. Is now clear?

Yes, my naive mind is clear now (thanks for razyasnenie)

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Only Russian art.
And the second: the conversation is about modern art, which is no longer collected Tretyakov, Sc. Department of Arts of the twentieth century, it is not even in Lavrushensky, but in another building, and at another address.

Then, if separately, Th worry about it?. I Glowno, What's the matter "obanyyv" alone was ...

Сообщение от LCR

The theme of the people, perhaps, should be set aside: science, also funded by national (fiscal) means, does not develop a "people", and its individual representatives, have this ability and have received appropriate education. Why do you want to in the art of the situation was different?

Sadly all this ... (going to write!)

[LCR]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

I have already written somewhere that the actual art is a product of consumer society.
In Russia, a very different historical situation, a different cultural background, and most other priority issues. (Not to fat) .. Why worry about a society torn by social and financial bundle more and this (importing) art .. Yes, let him live and develop-create-bought (in the individual personal gallery) ...

Indeed, better go write a picture, and then so you agree to an international conspiracy of reactionary forces to destroy the Russian art - the people - the soul.
Consequently, the actual art imported.
And what is the case with an icon, with the Russian art of XVIII-XIX centuries? Where Russian artists were sent to learn from someone now forged Shishkin do, eh?
The greatness of the artist is not determined by its national roots, and the assimilation of the entire world of art and the subsequent self-seeking - Russian avant-garde early XX century is enough to demonstrate this.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

I Glowno, What's the matter "obanyyv" alone was ...

This is not at all.
Of course, it is hard to judge the museum, if it was not.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от LCR

Hence, the actual art imported.

Yes, by and large. t.k.ne was no social or cultural or historical background ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

But what is the case with an icon, with the Russian art of XVIII-XIX centuries? Where Russian artists were sent to learn from someone now forged Shishkin do, eh?
The greatness of the artist is not determined by its national roots, and the assimilation of the entire world of art and the subsequent self-seeking - Russian avant-garde early XX century is enough to demonstrate this.
     

And this is what all true?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is not at all.

Look in the first picture: "Fuck you on here ... x, e. .. in your mouth, bitch e. .."
(moderator. it's not me, these are actual art-the first picture)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

The greatness of the artist is not determined by its national roots, and the assimilation of the entire world of art and the subsequent self-seeking

Golden words!

[LCR]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Yes, by and large. t.k.ne was no social or cultural or historical background ...

How interesting. Do not you have any sources that allow you to say that all these prerequisites are not there. Perhaps share with us? And then get a list of axioms

And then, imported from where? I can assure you that in France, Germany, the United States the actual art is a part of the population not less violent than in Russia, the reaction.

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

And this is what all true?

And you quoted a paragraph from my post refers to the fact that in the long run , representatives of one of the imported flow (European realism middle of the XIX century, under the leadership of the Party and government degenerated into production "honored" to Socialist Realism) - if we're talking about imported products - are trying to oust the representatives of another imported flow (the actual art). How about dividing the pie? )))

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Look at the first picture

Where to watch something? In the Tretyakov Gallery? I tell you again-that there is no.
On the fence too much to write ...
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...p;postcount=32

[NATA NOVA]

And no time for me this obskuristskim pounding in a mortar deal .. boring and unnecessary .. and nothing explains .. in gegemonstve I'm not interested (there is something to do)
case, you know, waiting to ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Where to watch something? In the Tretyakov Gallery? I tell you again, there is not.
On the fence too much to write ...

And who put the picture here? (I sketched out)

Nedopolov set (post 30)
Yes, this is not essential. are then tazhe. One of the features of postmodern action-va-cause shock. (as well as "Five-year" all mixed up ...)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And who put the picture here? (I sketched out)

Look, there is what you paint a draw? A?
Not toxic? Rastvorteli /thinners normal?
I have this to what you are asking such questions, I'm at a loss ...
Here's looking at the photo images, mate with her, could not rewrite in the author's view, the subject of further reading? I do not know ... : D