Go to fight some old - Страница 8 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Buscador · 26.07.2009, 12:23

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And you should see yourself on this "Wang" and that "Cars", but did not stick to my nose this letter.
I, unlike you, know, and author of the letter and the circumstances of the emergence of signatures on this letter.
I know and why and why this letter appeared on the Tretyakov Gallery.

What you clever! But we are not about you - intelligent, and not about me, read "Soviet newspapers," and the "Letter to the Minister of Culture Honored ....", which I have you in the nose did not shove." I want to remind you that it started with the theme, and here too, sorry, I'm not to blame (sorry, that is not so often read newspapers, and then, perhaps, he would raise this subject) ...

Кирилл Сызранский · 26.07.2009, 12:30

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

but the "Letter to the Minister of Culture Honored ....",

First ask, where is this "letter of Honored Worker of Culture" published and published it at all. You think the results of this "'s interest" would be interesting.

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

sorry that not so often read newspapers, and then, perhaps, he would raise this issue

To raise the topic should not read the papers, but to watch pictures in the Tretyakov Gallery. Sometimes ... : D: D: D

[color="# 666686"]Added after 55 seconds[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

What you clever!

Thank you.
modestly so.

Buscador · 26.07.2009, 13:01

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

To get started ask, where is this "letter of Honored Worker of Culture" opubltkovanno and published it at all

But this is not me, but dedulya37 ... Although I agree with the letter. And then it does not matter it is published or not.

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

have a picture in the Tretyakov Gallery to watch. Sometimes ...

Pictures in albums, but not in the Tretyakov Gallery ...

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Thank you.

Yes please ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I know and why and why this letter appeared on the Tretyakov Gallery.

So and speak to us.

Кирилл Сызранский · 26.07.2009, 13:26

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

And then it does not matter published or not.

Published only here:
http://www.maslovka.ru/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=906

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

pictures in albums, but not in the Tretyakov Gallery ...

If you communicate with artists, gallery owner and dealer, then you, the word "pictures" in relation to the pictures should not be surprising. So many people say, if not all. A sort of professional slang, really sorry ... : D

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от Buscador

So and speak to us.

This topic started 21/05/2009, all of whom it was interesting, all have long made it clear for myself. Yes, and recent personnel changes in the most GTG done talks on this theme is no longer relevant. Is that as an excuse potrendet on the forum about nothing ...

NATA NOVA · 26.07.2009, 13:42

Guided by common sense and historical norms of the conventional public morality could be derived from the letter of the main idea, which insist honored figures: the actual art should be separated from the Tretyakov Gallery ..
And another question, whether it is in the museum at all x (in a given place and at this time) must respond to those who pay for it: PEOPLE ..

My opinion: If the actual art can exist without the involvement gos.finansov, let them develop and then cooked in a gravy: kontseptualnae artists (producers), buyers (consumers)
People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet ..

What are you discussing?

Кирилл Сызранский · 26.07.2009, 13:53

Цитата:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet ..

"People"! Which "people"? You Who? On those other than vodka and zomboyaschika do not need anything? So that "the people" no art can not accept ...
"The people" ...
Only one who thinks - that nation. All the rest - people ... (c)

LCR · 26.07.2009, 14:10

Цитата:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Guided by common sense and historical norms of the conventional public morality could be derived from the letter of the main idea, which insist honored figures: the actual art should be separated from the Tretyakov Gallery ..
And another question, whether it is in the museum at all x (in a given place and at this time) must respond to those who pay for it: PEOPLE ..

My opinion: If the actual art can exist without the involvement gos.finansov, let them develop and then cooked in a gravy: conceptual artists (producers), buyers (consumers)
People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet ..

What are you discussing?

All would be right if people have not paid their finances (about the soul of its opinion do not have) for the development of the art practiced by artists who have signed this letter - in fact, and "deserved" something they were during the more recent of the existing system of state orders, plant etc.
So "Physician, heal yourself".
Or not?

Евгений · 26.07.2009, 14:21

Цитата:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet ..

I, too, "the people" and I like nonconformists, and that to respect the artists, can be called a word-obscurantism .. in the 21 century.

NATA NOVA · 26.07.2009, 14:38

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"people"! Which "people"? You Who? On those other than vodka and zomboyaschika do not need anything? So that "the people" no art can not accept ...
"The people" ...
Only one who thinks - that nation. All the rest - people ...(a)

So how many of our people then? ( "population"?)
Who pays the taxes (of whom calculate, that and the people, as well as his free time is to hold it (the people) a personal case)
That is, (as you get) is the people (who think) and there nenarod .. (I understood correctly?).
As with nenarodom proceed?

Евгений · 26.07.2009, 14:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

So how many of our people then?

One of our people .. an opinion on the exposure (in the Tretyakov Gallery) are different.

26.07.2009, 13:42	Язык оригинала: Русский #75
NATA NOVA Гуру Регистрация: 23.07.2009 Сообщений: 5,736 Спасибо: 8,058 Поблагодарили 4,382 раз(а) в 2,259 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 2 Репутация: 8507	Guided by common sense and historical norms of the conventional public morality could be derived from the letter of the main idea, which insist honored figures: the actual art should be separated from the Tretyakov Gallery .. And another question, whether it is in the museum at all x (in a given place and at this time) must respond to those who pay for it: PEOPLE .. My opinion: If the actual art can exist without the involvement gos.finansov, let them develop and then cooked in a gravy: kontseptualnae artists (producers), buyers (consumers) People should not pay with his soul, and finances for the fact that he nepriemlet .. What are you discussing?