Single feature ranking

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от fabosch

How come, in my opinion, you totally got and questions and suggestions
And I still have unanswered questions. Reproduce them again.
1. Have you discussed the possibility of official distribution exp in electronic version. It's quite modern mechanism demanded pay information dissemination. For example, on artinvestment so there is a database of sales.
Moreover, because it is clear that the future belonged to such a channel, not the paper, because the greater the amount of information, so inconvenient paper.
2. Is there anything in your official access basic statistical data on the distribution of artists by category, even if generalized (category 1A - 300 artists, 1B - 200, 2A - 2000, etc.), I am not talking about lists, grouped not alphabetically and by category (it actually is your commercial know-how that protects you as the apple of an eye).

1) discussed more than once. I already wrote about it. It is immediately published throughout the sites in search engines will rise above the official website of EXP, and update the information there is no will. The outcome will placheven. Here is still for many the 5 th edition - the ultimate truth, because he once appearing in Ineta
2) You will need such data? Can they prepare specifically for this forum, only justify, please, why not to do zryashnuyu job and not get into a situation of Section 1.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от klimvor

Employment of this rare and brilliant artist, at 4 A, URA

So, too, will not do. What an artist, how long a job? You never know, and have been unsuccessful work of genius? The artist is not the rating by one job.

Posted 15 minutes

Сообщение от K-Maler

That's not right. And the names can cause: all know each other ...
And this should be called Rating Rating ZAGRAEVSKY, and not a single rating (this claim is unfounded). Moreover, that "copyright in the concept has SV Zagraevsky" (quote from the "standard" 5 issue).
Generally, the rights to ideas and concepts are not protected by copyright ...

1) So you think N. Vorobiev, L. Gribkov, D. Groman, B. Zhutovski, A. Colley, L. Metchnikoff, V. Preobrazhenskaya, MV Sapozhnikov, Leonid Rabichev, V. Shors and other belyutintsy ( number in the dozens) should be in the same category? Of course, I will convey to the RC is your opinion, but personally, I categorically disagree. These were different artists back in belyutinsky period, and then the way many of them went all drastically.

2) The copyright concept is really not protected (Article 6 of the Act), but the author of the concept of EXP, however, Zagraevsky <!--~ 1 "-" for nothing here that is just lazy has not spoken on the subject of that SV dreamed of categories A and B?