Single feature ranking
 

Hello, dear colleagues!
In this forum, frequently asked questions about the directory, "One Art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/index.htm

I think that would be helpful if I will participate in the forum and to the best of their abilities and rights (a very limited <!--~ 2 "-"), executive secretary of the Rating center of trade unions of artists will answer your questions.

Surely you have and suggestions on the ratings of artists. I undertake to transmit to destination in the rating area with necessary comments.

The only request: to clothe and supply issues in a civilized form ;) "But I thought that rudeness on this forum is not <!--~ There is 1 ~ ->

Here are some basic options:
Guidelines for determining the rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm
Archived:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ4.htm
The new project "International art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
Internet project "10000 best artists in the world" (based on the ratings):
http://painters.artunion.ru/best.htm

Olga Ozolin, this issue was already raised at the forum. Maybe it makes sense to combine the two themes into one with a broader context, ie discuss this topic has not a single "unified artistic rating, while all the ratings, which fall into the hands? Comparing the different ratings, you can more effectively identify their particular strengths and weaknesses.

The tone of discussion in the topic does not suit me. I was not interested in general opinions about the EXP, had heard for 11 years and praises, and curses, and slander ((((
EXP is already in the institutes are held, what is the point to discuss it in general?

Just if something can be useful in the sense of explaining some specific things, glad to help.

Explain please what downgrades artists?

In my opinion, a normal tone.

Added after 5 minutes

As soon as you have decided to discuss and answer questions about the EXP at the forum, then get ready to listen to different opinions. Everyone comes from his understanding and he not know what you "been listening to for 11 years." Different people - different opinions.

Clearly, we seek ..

I am interested in two specific things: what is said above danvik, on what principle is downgrade artists? And second, how is it that the artist change the drive letter (for example, with "A" to "B")? For example, a "2A", became the "2B". How can such changes occur, if the artist is long dead, but his musical legacy has long been known professional community, and therefore any factors that could significantly affect the re-evaluation of his legacy, can not be? From which emanate the drafters of EXP in these cases?

(Sorry if off topic.)
 

In the spring found the site "artnet".

Liked it.
Went through .. (Many naryla interesting) ..

I go in late September and find that information on the sales of those artists that I issued in the spring, will no longer be issued (for some reason) ..

Who knows.
why and how it works (which determines) ..

Thank you.

Throw in slot $ 30 for 30 days and begin popping up artists.

NATA NOVA, you subscribe free?