Disputes about the transcription

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от LCR

Stop fooling is going on here cyber-population, Mr. Igor Guriev, go better read something, "Iwangi", for example, or "Robinson Crusoe", these excellent novels not fail to set you on a lofty manner, and all of this will be good - and you, and we

And who fool?

I just do the best outside of Russia editor of Russian texts I share his knowledge.

_____________________________

Another time.
For example, there is the traditional spelling of the names of Ronald, Donald, etc.

I want to write Rumsfeld.
But no. We must now write Rumsfeld.

Therefore, write this: Donald Rumsfeld.

Frans Hals is pronounced in the original language as Hulse.

But traditionally it is written Hals, although there were attempts to deprive him of the names of euphony.

They shall not pass!

[dedulya37]

Igor Guriev,

Please tell us whether commonly accepted expression "International Women's Day"?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Igor Guriev,

Please tell us whether commonly accepted expression "International Women's Day"?

So it's in English, but I edit only Russian texts and transcription of names into Russian.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

So it's in English

Thank you, intelligibly.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I edit only Russian texts and transcription of names into Russian.

What language? If the Russian to "his" Russian, it is a slang editing ... And has nothing to do with the generally accepted rules ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Buscador

What language?

From any.

Many times I edited the translation into Russian.

You can not even be before the eyes of the original: it is always clear where the translated incorrectly.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

always see where translated correctly

Was silent, silent - and could not stand it. Seen, where in Russian is written incorrectly, and the correctness of the translation is checked only by the original.
 
And with regard to names, in fact, everything should be based on compromise. The most important thing: there are dictionaries, which would be a kind of writing would be recorded as normative. And if so, use some common form, but if the old masters of this form for many years regarded as a well-established and often fixed in the authoritative encyclopedic editions (I emphasize - not in the official dictionary of the Russian language, as, for example, BSE), then the names of contemporary authors or artists, writers, etc., which in our country began to write for the most part after the fall of the Iron Curtain, there is inconsistency.

What? Each editor solves this issue for himself, each time in collaboration with the author, and not in arguments with him. For the task they have one - most accurately convey to the reader the author's thought and not to the reader to additional problems in reading and understanding the text. Certainly, there is required a compromise, but only one immutable rule of uniformity within a single publication.

Entrenched over decades of writing (in print) is better not to conflict with (this is not necessary, and, most importantly, it will interfere with the reading), but to know the maximum close to the original sound is very, very helpful. And if writing neustoyavshesya - as, for example, Miro, it is better to take a sample again, as close to the original source, ie, in this case, since he Catalan, Joan Miro.

My friends told the translator, as the institute on the lessons of the Japanese threatened terrible retribution to those who say the sushi bar instead of the sushi bar. Formally, the teacher and the right and wrong simultaneously. Translator from Japanese to know the correct pronunciation, but a translator from Japanese to Russian needs to know to write, recorded in the dictionary of Russian language as normative. There are compromises on level ground.

Know must necessarily, and in what situation which option to use - a question of culture and education.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Allena

better to take a sample again as close to the original source, ie in this case, since he katalonets, Joan Miro.

Proposal reasonable, but Pozdnjak flounce.

Long write Joan Miro (AT LEAST FORTY YEARS), and will remain so.

Joan Miro - not Catalan artist, and SPANISH.

Generally, shakes me self-confidence of some people (I do not mean just you), do not have any idea about such delicate matters as the theory, practice and history of transcriptions.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

long write Joan Miro, and remain so.

Reading your comment, I remembered Pushkin. Don Juan! Do not Don Juan, like Byron, in the already known then, it seems, translation. An entirely different image, not from the local spaces ... Byron he earth's handsome ... Juan Miro is the same as if under a different sound, and painting it would be "not so".

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Reading your comment, I remembered Pushkin. Don Juan!

Then the general transcription were barbaric.

Shaftsburi, for example.

Find out who?