Examination of works of Russian and foreign painting and graphics XVI-XX centuries.

[Artem]

Post Eugene. All of this was discussed more than once :"... experts are not legally liable for the correctness of the attribution, as it is interpreted as their scientific and informed opinion, and not a statement ... " (http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=84111) meaning to sue? "Yes, in court and will not accept such a statement, perhaps you're a lawyer, you know better. But for the last 15-20 years there was no precedent.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------
I followed your advice deleted the message - A brief comment on the legal regulation of expert activity.as useless.
With regard to article to which you refer to - Konstantin Azadovsky: Russian Museum against Benoit. I have more information about it. Things might be different.
  You're absolutely right - there were no precedents. (Liability of experts) and not be discussed in court moglo.Nezhelanie poryake and Preveli to such results. Sorry for the time spent - Brief comment on the legal regulation of expert activity. " In any case, thanks for the feedback on my work useless.