Question?

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Talk about investing in art without talking about the art itself is not possible.
The investment will be successful only in the present art, the art of quality, so to speak.

But the DPJ's "creators" and "Sellers" everything can look completely different! Distracted "chatter" about painting artists can irritate business people, because all - not the case. Like, excuse me, irritated impressionism (well, all the "new") at the time. And not some academics, I suppose, but traders. Imagine Pearl in Salon with her in ... !) Of course, later had to because of this, a salon Independent, etc., but what works and how much time all it took! (And the funniest thing that the "practical" and it then "captured"). Ie here a certain dilemma: what comes first - the chicken or the egg? Artist of the seller or the seller for the artist (art)? One without the other can not (not in Paradise deuce, money to solve all the land)), but both are so different! The vendor is that the artist feels bad and will never. Just imagine what would be an independent forum of artists!))) Madhouse on macaroni factory (incidentally, at first. But then there would be "practical "))).

The investment will be successful in this art (the COP) - this is the LRA, in fact, all artists want to believe!