Question?

[Allena]

Сообщение от I-V

Without the law, ie without regulation of relations did not come

Oh, now administrators quickly explained, whose cones in the woods! "While they, of course, try to minimally interfere with the process.

But in fact we are accustomed to, that someone taxis, some body, on a leash holds. And what about the self, eh? Weak? Well, we lazily at least in something to limit myself - in a sweet, a drunk, smoked in! Slothful Here and in the statements of some feel the absolute freedom - and no responsibility.

On the other hand, for the educated man cultural communication - it's just natural, and do not have anything to limit myself, just live normally.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Allena

On the other hand, for the educated man cultural communication - it's just natural

As Tolstoy said: It is time for all good men to come and kill the bad!)))

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от IV

As Tolstoy said: It is time for all good men to come together and to kill the bad!)))

At the turn of the century

Took and overthrew

Evil man

Good man.

From grenade

She slapped him, kid!

So good a

It's stronger evil ... (c)

[Peter]

Сообщение от IV

Well, that's right! Without the law, ie without regulation of relations did not come out. Including the forum. The question is, who will be more authority to propose rules that would satisfy everyone. Authority as the U.S. Congress).

God created all people different, and Mr. Colt equated them rights!

[SAH]

Сообщение от IV

As Tolstoy said: It is time for all good men to come and kill the bad!)))

After that, they have good may not actually be.
Automatically pass into the category of bad.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Allena

But in fact we've learned that someone steers, someone in charge, on a leash holds. And what about the self, huh? Weak? Well at least we lazily in something to limit myself - a sweet, drunk, smoked in! Lazy! Here and in the statements of some feel the absolute freedom - and no responsibility.

On the other hand, for the educated person's cultural dialogue - it's just natural, and do not have anything to limit myself and just live as usual.

You are absolutely correct written, but in a sense quite useless, because I have not seen the "uncultured" man who even in the depths of the soul, its own "bezkulture. That's the way life is ... not for the intellectuals

[Любознательный]

I assume that the objective of art-world is divided into two categories: the "creator" and "glyadtsOv" (sorry for the neologism, but another - a more capacious word I have not found).
This division, I believe, dates back to the moment of laying the foundations of the infrastructure of the art market - a period of rock art.
Even then some were engaged in self-expression, other glyadeniem. And they both enjoyed. Some people - from its exclusivity and value of others - from participation in the miracle. Of course, cave paintings could not carry away (for sale) separately from the cave. But it is possible that someone from "glyadtsov is not privatized the cave with a painting and not take a tribute for her visit. Perhaps practical people already understood the difference between a walrus (as they like to express our forum) and the volume of sales. To increase that amount required to increase the creative team and a mass attraction "gdyadtsov" from other tribes. Willy-nilly, there was information space. Since the age of the century the number fell "glyadtsov" willing to participate in daily heats of mammoths, some of them are reshaped in the wall of commentators wonder. To stand out from the crowd "glyadtsov and completely cut off the other" glyadtsov "on its share of Mammoth, commentators have come up with their own special language, inaccessible to the uninitiated. To really confuse the uninitiated, unenlightened "glyadtsov, commentators began to call loudly right corner, left, and the left corner - right.
There happened first crisis - resulted in "glyadtsy, not poglyadevshie miracle.
"Creators" crisis overcame a change of material and style. Then, they are "creators".
Came to the rescue in time made it possible to replace Obshcheplemennaja caves to individual residential construction, and hard rock - on a different basis.
Painting at once become transportable and, most importantly, prodazhesposobnoy.
Practical men of the "glyadtsov" created their own cohort of "sellers".

Since then, and has become a tradition. One (impractical, but proud) - the glory and adulation, and the other (practical) - everything else. Third - chasing a mammoth pointensivnee to make it for that look, and if successful you are lucky - and then buy.

So who are the strongest link in the centuries-old whirlwind: "creator" or "glyadtsy?
NO.
Interconnected we all are.
Inseparably.
As part of one single body - of our forum.
Here - every bass in a row.

I think so.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от IV

investment will be successful in this art (the COP) - this is the LRA, in fact, all artists want to believe!

"Dreaming is not bad, bad, not to dream ..."

Illusions of us to write and live help ...

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от fabosch

So is life ...
not for the intellectuals

This is absolutely true ..
But still, if there is the slightest opportunity, "kuchkovanie" they will inevitably and irreversibly ..

[Самвел]

Сообщение от inquisitive

As part of one single organism - our forum.

There is a second question, which comes from the first, it is relationships between our forum. After expressing his negative opinion about the artist, willy nilly stanovishsya not talk undesirable for the artist, but also spoil the relationship with those who represent the artist. But have formed, the virtual relationships between people, and I like some I know who I was, or my theme support, and can no longer be independent in his judgments. Of course it is everyone's business, and he decides to speak or not. But do not lose it on this forum?

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от Samvel; 1292821]After expressing his negative opinion about the artist, willy nilly stanovishsya not only undesirable for the artist, but also spoil the relationship with those who represent the artist.[/QUOTE]

But stupidity all eto.Odinakovo good for all will not be ... expressed his negative opinion about the artist, to express their opinion only, and not someone else.
 
[QUOTE="Samvel; 1292821

But do not lose it on this forum?

But what does he lose ...?