The claim emerged in the paintings of Nicholas Glushchenko.

[тандем]

Сообщение от Eugene

If the court decided to transfer pictures Larissa Glushchenko, what's the problem? clear ..
Where is it they sell it in Ukraine or in the U.S., it is her case personally.

No Problem! This is prodigy, that the court defended the rights of private persons in a dispute with the state scorned its own Constitution. It is - as abnormally Bermuda Triangle. Mysteriously, like a snow man.
Koneno, even takes advantage of the fact that it belongs!
 But many others want the same. Therefore, the clue of this phenomenon is so exciting .......

[Veronic]

Сообщение от tandem

This is prodigy, that the court defended the rights of private persons in a dispute with the state scorned its own Constitution. It is - as abnormally Bermuda Triangle. Mysteriously, as the snowman .
Koneno, even takes advantage of the fact that it belongs!
 But many others want the same. Therefore, the clue of this phenomenon is so exciting .......

Ukraine wants to get into the EU, and EU laws are such that after the entry of the country will have to reconsider many private ownership. For example, if they found the heir to the state object (such as a castle or manor house), then the State will have to return property or compensate for the money. Therefore, over time, the heirs may appear on many things, which the State is not quite legitimately once privatized.
Apparently this case is the preparation. And rich or poor has nothing to do with it, we must respect private property.

[тандем]

[NATA NOVA]