The claim emerged in the paintings of Nicholas Glushchenko.

[Yaya]

Pretty weak, in my view, a trick - accuse Larissa Hlushchenko for selfish motives. Even if they do occur, so what? More importantly - can the lawyers to bring the matter before the execution of court decisions. In our wonderful country this is quite difficult. Touched by the position of the museum, which, instead of appeal (which actually would have been logical on their part), wrote a strange letter Kivalov. In fact, why the deputy did not overturn the decision of the court? ..

[тандем]

Сообщение от Yaya

In fact, why the deputy did not cancel the decision of the court? ..

Yes, I liked this passage:
".- In addition, we asked the chairman of the parliamentary committee on justice Sergei Kivalov requested help resolution of the conflict and to investigate the misdeeds of the judges of the court of Kyiv Shevchenko."
This is the shortest way to solve the issue, because "Pidrahuy" (nicknamed "pidrahuy" - "Calculate" translated into Russian, is derived from the Ukrainian "rahuvati"-take was given Kivalov in 2004)
 Kuchma, not just chairs the committee in the parliament, and is an active chairman of the Higher Council of Justice, after the nominee was elected Chairman VJ kum Kivalov, Kolesnichenko.V his hands the fate of all judges in Ukraine.
On the other hand, do not know who is behind Larisa Glushchenko and whose desire to get transferred from Ukraine to the United States legally paintings, performs Shevchenko district court of Kyiv since in Ukraine, no judicial decision is not accepted by the law and only on the basis of expediency.

[vyadem]

Сообщение от tandem

On the other hand, do not know who is behind Larisa Glushchenko and whose desire to get transferred from Ukraine to the United States legally pictures

not the fact that the paintings leave Ukraine. I remember a couple of years ago, Larisa Glushchenko came to Kiev and sold the painting of his grandfather. So, in my opinion, there is just normal deriban.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от vyadem

paintings were handed over to the widow Hlushchenko archive in perpetuity to use free of charge, and such contract is terminated after the death of the party that transferred property. Legally in the archive there is no reason to keep the picture ".

vyadem, if the court decided to transfer pictures Larissa Glushchenko, what's the problem? clear ..
Where is it they sell it in Ukraine or in the U.S., it is her case personally.

[Yaya]

[тандем]

Сообщение от Eugene

If the court decided to transfer pictures Larissa Glushchenko, what's the problem? clear ..
Where is it they sell it in Ukraine or in the U.S., it is her case personally.

No Problem! This is prodigy, that the court defended the rights of private persons in a dispute with the state scorned its own Constitution. It is - as abnormally Bermuda Triangle. Mysteriously, like a snow man.
Koneno, even takes advantage of the fact that it belongs!
 But many others want the same. Therefore, the clue of this phenomenon is so exciting .......

[Veronic]

Сообщение от tandem

This is prodigy, that the court defended the rights of private persons in a dispute with the state scorned its own Constitution. It is - as abnormally Bermuda Triangle. Mysteriously, as the snowman .
Koneno, even takes advantage of the fact that it belongs!
 But many others want the same. Therefore, the clue of this phenomenon is so exciting .......

Ukraine wants to get into the EU, and EU laws are such that after the entry of the country will have to reconsider many private ownership. For example, if they found the heir to the state object (such as a castle or manor house), then the State will have to return property or compensate for the money. Therefore, over time, the heirs may appear on many things, which the State is not quite legitimately once privatized.
Apparently this case is the preparation. And rich or poor has nothing to do with it, we must respect private property.

[тандем]

[NATA NOVA]

[vyadem]

Eugene, well, you know our court from the area "the most humane court in the world "
A decision is made, withdraws his second. In matters relating to Western Ukraine decides, the court in the East and vice versa. In a word - a farce!
That's more in another issue - human.
I certainly do not judge, I have no place granddaughter Glushchenko, and certainly do not know the completeness of the whole situation ... but the part looks like a "raider attack". Her family in their right mind gave the painting to the museum. Now she simply wants to pick them up. One thing if for a museum, etc. But looking at what's left in the studio Hlushchenko after all sales. Museum there and does not smell.
But I repeat, not for me to judge. Perhaps there are some other reasons.