"Russia's modern abstraction of secondary importance to define"

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Vaulin Alexey

Paul, and what this means: «not enough to make an abstraction, must be original»
And «all the development of abstraction have been exhausted» please explain, please, what about Eugene Mikhnov-Voitenko opened up new horizons in the abstract or very sharp Boris Turkish painter in its brevity, or Lydia Masterkova, Francisco Infante, Boris Markovnikov, or Sasha Ponomarev I will not mention the very young generation of artists?
In my opinion in the 21 st century as it is indecent to talk about the "originality" in art are all very closely intertwined

I know Turkish. Studied with him in the same year. The fact that he taught at Stroganovka does not mean severity of work. Rather, he always tried to show that he knows how to draw. But it is natural to school, but the monochrome images, and little expressive. I think that if you look at magazines and websites you can find a lot of things that have gone from one or the other artist. That would be nothing if artists grow in experience, but they are also trying to improve, do better neater, but if you look at all the famous artists are explorers, style, trends, etc. with the response they have not always very precisely because it is not allowed to taste and creative temperament. Great and great because they found its original way to be times when it seemed all intertwined and have an open and done, but there is Van Gogh, all of which are taught and can never learn to paint, which makes all awry, as Cezanne ....