Need Advice!

[Eriksson]

Friends !

Need advice . The situation is this . In 2008, a rustic Swedish auction I bought the picture , the description of which was available for the artist name . Picture hanging for me almost 5 years and I sell it into his head . Pulled down to " Bukovskis " it took no doubting the authenticity of any picture or signature. To sell the work in the last year for almost the same amount that was purchased , the gift that estimate " Bukovskis " set much higher.

Just get a mail with " Bukovskis " the threat to collect from me the cost of painting as a new customer images allegedly questioned its authenticity. " B. " offers me in turn advertise the auction , the seller, knowing full well that there do not accept claims on the grounds of nullity .

To begin, I sent them to ... only in other words . I replied that as a private and honest buyer , I can not be responsible for the activities of the auction and invited them to deal directly between the auction houses.

What else can I give arguments in his defense , if fucking " B. " nevertheless will continue to settle ?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eriksson

as a new customer images allegedly questioned the authenticity of her

any questions he should ask to auction, where he bought a thing.

Of course, the auction tried to resolve the issue with your money.

I think the second time they are to you for them not turn.

[Eriksson]

Cyril Syzransky, Oh, I hope ... Especially because I just picked up the documents and made ​​sure that when I bought the picture , then I took and droit de suite.

But in general I of "B " is already so tired, no words. In the past year I have there is banal stole now accepted for evaluation. I have a year of them beat out the money and still won , though at lower estimate . But the whole year, these "b . " twisted , twirled and drank the blood , and now seems to have decided to drink the remains of ...

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от sergejnowo

Legal answer is right there, any arguments or secondary emotions

You're absolutely right, sergejnowo!

[Утагава Кунисадович]

That is, they took a picture of the "look" and then said that will not give up, because why?

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Utagawa Kunisadovich

That is, they took a picture of the "look" and then said that will not give up, because why?

Utagawa Kunisadovich, was nothing like that.
The painting was sold a year ago, and now the new owner Bukovskis filed a claim, it is supposedly not the author.

[Утагава Кунисадович]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Utagawa Kunisadovich, was nothing like that . The painting was sold a year ago, and now the new owner Bukovskis filed a claim, it is supposedly not the author .

Excuse me, I asked the question is not clear . I'm talking about the one second that you have described , the case . When they are " squeezed " picture. How do they argued ?

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Utagawa Kunisadovich ; 2822041 "

I'm talking about the second one , described by you in case. When they are " squeezed " picture.

That picture they are not " squeezed " . She just disappeared. First, a few months dupe of a picture show expert. Then I went bodyaga about the fact that "the expert look , but you have to think ." I demanded to work, as became interested in the Auktsionverkete . After that, a few months they " were looking for in stock," and reported that it is a very difficult exercise , because it is difficult to find a single piece of 100 thousand pieces of something else ... Complicated by the fact that the picture was taken without my consent in Finland.
Well, in the end, I brutalized and threatened that reported to the police and at the same time " selling " the news in the newspaper that the "B " wound thief .
Here then is we are talking about compensation. "B" is, of course , decided to get rid of the three coppers . But !
I do not know what more I helped in the unequal struggle : macro signature that I could do or - Reputation Forum " Artinvestment", which at one time and it was established authorship of the work . Thanks Raskatova, he then identified the author :
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=126523

Such is the " epic" .

[Утагава Кунисадович]

Wow, that is, they simply lost.
Apologized at least?


By the way, about the pictures on the cover of a cigar box - about a month ago, I saw something like this ...
in Metropolis what?
You did not notice?
And there is the cover has been labeled in Russian.

[Seriy]

By the way, wooden plate as the basis for the painting can be purchased in stores now for artists (in the West), EM is not antique exotic, who like-writes on an array of wood.

[sergejnowo]

Eriksson, for a start, to change the direction of thinking.
In today's world of rights is not the one who is right , but the one who secured the better .
Carefully read the contract that was signed between you and the " Bukovskis ."
Then read the legal conditions of purchase on the " Bukovskis ," especially the return policy works.
Legal answer is right there, any arguments or emotions are secondary.
It seems to me that the buyer must give you a written legally credible evidence that the work left .