Khmelko

[ksenjaru]

Good day,


Please help in the evaluation of paintings

Author Khmelko

1939

hmm

[Игорь Гурьев]

In my opinion, this portrait may be of interest except that the family depicted.

Can it also be interested museum or a museum of tobacco growing in the city, the birthplace of Comrade.
Khmelko (if there is a museum and he has the money to purchase).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ksenjaru

Khmelko

Mikhail Khmelko (1919-1996), Soviet and Ukrainian painter.
People's Artist of USSR (1963).
Winner of two Stalin Prizes (1948, 1950).
A member of the CPSU in 1954. This one?

[ksenjaru]

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran

this?

Cyril, thank you.
Others do not know

But Guriev, Igor already has a clear view and odnaznachno

[artcol]

Сообщение от ksenjaru

opinion

The work-it is not bad - but I have the liquidity is low.
Most likely.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от ksenjaru; 1968171"

Please help in the evaluation of paintings

Сообщение от ksenjaru; 1968831"

But Guriev , Igor already has a clear and odnaznachno opinion

Guriev , Igor as "the art historian from the town of P." provides exceptional rating scenic qualities of this particular picture, and he does not care for such jewels as " People's Artist of USSR " and " member of the CPSU in 1954 ." It was as if he puts his own cost: how much such a thing would have bought a man versed in the art " out of town PA ." I believe that those who value first and foremost an artistic component of the works is to listen to his opinion . There are, of course, other measure of value of work , such as an autograph of the artist, but there's - to each his own .

[artcol]

Сообщение от Amateur

Guriev , Igor as "the art historian from the town of P." provides exceptional rating scenic qualities of this particular picture

I think he is talking about the likelihood of its sale. Azhivopisnye quality , in principle, satisfactory. As a general, and declared to the author.

By the way, Khmelko interested forumchanin Barvikha, he can give an assessment .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Amateur; 1968961"

I believe that those who value first and foremost an artistic component of the works is to listen to his opinion .

And that, in the illustrated portrait not the " art part "? What's wrong with " picturesque qualities of this particular painting ?"

Or do you , dear Amateur, apply to the council consider " museum of tobacco farming ," or the " Museum of the City , the birthplace of Comrade . Khmelko (if there is a museum and he has the money to purchase )" this is " exceptional rating scenic qualities of this particular painting ?"

Сообщение от artcol; 1969021"

Azhivopisnye quality , in principle, satisfactory. As a general, and the author claimed .

Portrait of a great simple - and painting, and the presence in it of a clear mind and a bright taste of the time.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Portrait of a great simple - and painting, and the presence in it of a clear mind and a bright taste of the time.

Most likely - yes.
But the photo of this, but can not see anything.

[Барвиха]

. Yes, the picture is not very!
But I'm at your own risk, suggested 500dollarov.Bolshe not see for yourself smysla.U I have some work Khmelko, but they are of another time and an entirely different quality, already a mature master.