Where sunsets sovriska market?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

Then what is the question?

And you do not see my question?

Duplicate it, but the answer is not necessarily, "passed," as the saying goes:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

And what's the Internet?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

And you do not see my question?
Duplicate it, but the answer is not necessarily, "passed," as the saying goes:

I think I answered your question? The meaning of my answer was: there would be no Internet, there would be no forum, and participants under the name Cyril Syzran.

This is also writing and art Fabosh Lowery:

Just, I think, for a hundred years, much has changed society's requirements to be met by art. And whether we like it or not, this is an objective process, even with all that amount of foam, which, perhaps, sometimes closes the rest.
Yes, there is, of course, excessive monopolization of the market, but I'm not really sure that this market monopolization will benefit. But who knows ...

"Paradigms of Human Development" is already changing. For example, if you had all been too fixated on the whole, it is now growing interest in the particular and the individual. This is a fundamentally important process.
Market very late to react to new trends, and unable to make some calls on your device.

I would like to Art-Lover'om talk with you, we have talked, I remember your resume. A theme arhiinteresnaya.

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от artcol; 2223151 "

Quote :
Posted by Art-lover
Why not sketch the contours of an alternative in the imagination of the world, where it is easy to breathe , and a good artist and collector , but through institutions competed for the right to be there to please them both ?

You read my mind , sir ... Internet? I see no other options.

Pardon, monsieur, kopipeystom not dabble . His noodle enough)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Art-lover

Pardon, monsieur, kopipeystom not dabble . His noodle enough )

How funny happened .
 

One saw in " alternative circuits of the world" online as "through the institution ," and another for " Internet" - a reference to possible plagiarism.
 

A conversation between two women:
- Yes , summer this year is not happy - it's not a freak!
Pickles - these are (showing the middle finger ), tomatoes - these are ( twisting a ring of the thumb and index finger).
Girlfriend , absently :
- So what? The main thing that was a good man !

[artcol]

Сообщение от Art-lover

Pardon, monsieur, kopipeystom not dabble.
His noodle enough)

The idea belongs to the one who shares.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

How funny happened.
 



One saw in "alternative circuits of the world" online as "through the institution," and another for "Internet" - a reference to possible plagiarism.
 

And what's the mb plagiarism?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

And what's the mb plagiarism?

It you ask your companion and author of this message:

Сообщение от Art-lover

Pardon, monsieur, kopipeystom not dabble.
His noodle enough)

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

 
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Gygy, gygy


Whether it was necessary to get into the theme for this "gygy"?


Please admins clean the dialogue "about nothing."

[Art-lover]

artcol, Cyril Syzran is right: your question to me can be interpreted in two ways.
After all, however, may also unscrupulous telepathic thoughts of others to read, copy and paste as your own? And so many people of their brains prosthetic borrowings from Neta - do not count.
I and "pecked" at this point, because he came to me on the corn: on the eve of one participant kleila me paraphrase a book I have not read.
And came out really funny.

Now, in the second sense: one Ineta market, of course, not be built. Mean much live contact, the atmosphere exposure and so on., And not all of the pictures on the reproductions and photos are revealed by the end - it is necessary in the "real world" look. But, I agree that the system of market adjustment tool is a powerful communications, and its capabilities are not manifested. Work here and work. The mere addition of the market feedback loop is worth.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2223191"

Collector for all artists is not enough even "in the mind", but I agree - you can dream.

Why all collect? Has not been canceled by natural selection, arising from inequality of abilities (weak and medium lot of artists, strong enough). And human nature is diverse: one million Picasso, Rothko other, third Gapchinskaya)).

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2223211"

Collectors institutions themselves, they are intermediaries galleries are not needed.

Galleries are not necessary if the collectors open their collections to be able to review and based on them to organize the art centers of communication, propaganda art, art education. In general, will become model gallery owners.

Сообщение от artcol; 2223291"

Request to admins to clean the dialogue "about nothing."

Lord, what if we do not take your admins from coffee and their own beds weed?

[таша]

Сообщение от Art-lover; 2223131"

Why not sketch out the contours of an alternative in the imagination of the world, where it is easy to breathe, and a good artist and collector, but through institutions competed for the right to be there to please them both?

Сообщение от artcol; 2223151"

online? I see no other options.

Well, for example: http://www.artguide.ru/ru/news/761

Virtual exhibition online Korean Artist Project

"Seoul has launched portal Korean Artist Project, which is to help young contemporary artists to enter the international art scene. Pass the portal virtual exhibitions of artists, the selection of which produce Korean curators of art museums, and a final decision is made by a special jury of Korean and international art critics. digitized virtual exhibition presents a collection of works, biography and video interviews of artists, critics, opinions about their work. "

Koreans certainly not discovered America, but it is also an option. In the presence of the artist himself, and his work and peer review. Quite worthy alternative galleries, unlike Russian virtual-art where the dismantling quality criteria are missing (all together indiscriminately) Such artistic shopping sites are not credible for consumers of art, just because of their "omnivorous" and the lack of a clear policy of quality. But if everything is done "in the mind" why not.
 But it should still be in the real world and show-NonCommercial-appropriate sites. Desirable state and cultural institutions-shows, biennials and group exhibitions, perhaps personal. Since the object of art is to be realized in nature, even media art requires embodiment in some material form, to become a commodity.
In this case, the art is the aura of the work remains an element of entertainment, attractiveness, which gives only exposure "live"
Good to still that serious virtual institution taking on the function of the centralized storage and works-in renting large warehouse area, cheaper than renting a specially equipped premises for many small galereek. Even under the condition of the organization + shipping works. Accordingly, such vitualno real-portal is one of its kind is a huge gallery, select, coordinating, selling and simultaneously raising and information agent taste. This eliminates the main causes of stagnation in the gallery business specialization (for example, is a concept to us, and naive not to us), a limited number of artists, philosophers mezhdusoboya fighting off potential buyers and others. Of course, everything is taken for a certain percentage of the sale, as well as in galleries. A good idea is a portal promoted by Russian artists, organized the exhibition at fairs, resold at auction, briefly acted as a Joint Dealer. At integration and centralization always cut costs and incomes rise. Artists and their representatives may make shareholders of the company. But of course needs to be a face-control
Clearly, a utopia, but we can dream
Although, now thought, and I want to? I do not know.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Art-lover; 2224221"

Yes, and human nature is diverse: one million Picasso, Rothko other , third Gapchinskaya )).

There are collectors Gapchinska ?

Collectors are generally very small and, in my opinion , talking about the art market , and they can not be ignored , they do not make the weather on it.
To change the " rotten state of Denmark " needs the mass market art , not collectors piece - " the directors themselves ."

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Art-lover; 2224221"

Gallery are not necessary if the collectors open their collections to be able to review and based on them to organize the art centers of communication, propaganda art, art education. In general, will become model gallery owners .

Yes , funny sentence galleries are not needed - public collections will be galleries.
King is dead. Long live the King ! ( a )