Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[SAH]

Сообщение от mezon

probably agree with you. I think our views coincide not the first time

Absolutely, I am very pleasant and interesting to you read. Actually I must say that meaningful дискусия turned. Jana is also a participant has made me a positive and enjoyable. Thank you.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от artcritic

This is certainly not Leonardo, but what a forger

It was Leonardo. Images of these literally exuded lust.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcritic

This is certainly not Leonardo, but what a forger =)

This is just something in his spirit.
It is only necessary to read his own biography. Yes, and he left a great literary heritage. They all find.
And Freud is the work of Da Vinci. Polyubopytstvuyte at leisure.
Z. Freud. Memoirs of Leonardo Da Vinci on early detste.
Freud. Artist and fantasizing.
And the angel now.
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), "Angel in the flesh", 1513-1515, the black chalk or charcoal on blue paper,
268 × 197 mm. German private collection. At the Conservation Fund Pedretti, Los Angeles, California, USA.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I can not believe that you are the artist's wife ...

Cyril, imagine that, yes .....

Anyway, I already took a shit in little jars and pissing boys, leave this topic for discussion, art critics. Otherwise, got carried away and not noticing, as a professor of health workers are isolated in a psychiatric hospital with a gag in his mouth :-)
Now there are things more interesting, such as visiting exhibitions of contemporary painting!! in three waves (Hall could not accommodate everyone at once), sales crazy, it's something I encountered at the last exhibition in Budapest. The idea is interesting, as some give here, if you see what's what before the end of the concept of the gallery (London).

[Mark]

Nedogonov, if not your combativeness a'la rudeness, then with many that VYy write mzhno agree. But it will be only one view imeyuschih right to life as everyone else. In your posts there is a sense and logic, there is only one thing - the desire to hear drkgie opinion.
I for example, is also not a fan of the Cheka and the avant-garde, but for someone the KGB - a kind of mandala, an icon in which he looks for his revelations, ktoto is squared mystical beginning of the latent meaning, someone - a mathematical basis. Everyone is different and we all have different perceptions of how you Pisz "every concept has its own perception of the" mere fact that people break the spear after 100 years of the Cheka had already said about his bezuslovenoy value. And if such works were more, then people would have been critical of ourselves and knowledgeable in the arts that we all love. A вобще read your interesting, thanks

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

And yet, I already took a little shit in jars and pissing boys, leave this topic for discussion, art critics.

Eh, as you sank just what these two "products" ...

[artcritic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And the angel here.
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), "Angel in the flesh", 1513-1515, the black chalk or charcoal on blue paper,
268 × 197 mm. German private collection. At the Conservation Fund Pedretti, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Miniatures
Click image for larger version Name: Leonardo Da Vinci .. jpg Views: 13 Size: 182.6 KB ID: 247315

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

[SAH]

Сообщение от artcritic

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

There everything is in harmony, this drawing of Leonardo. And not only on the subject.

[ФЕОФАН МУХИН]

Сообщение от artcritic

At first glance it seems that someone is dorisoval later .. do not you think?

Angels are usually portrayed as a fair-haired androgynous (possessing characteristics of both sexes) of boys with wings (a symbol of freedom of the spirit) in a white linen dress with golden girdles.
- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[artcritic]

Сообщение от Mukhin ФЕОФАН

The angels are usually portrayed as a fair-haired androgynous (possessing characteristics of both sexes) of boys with wings (a symbol of freedom of the spirit) in a white linen dress with golden girdles.
- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And where that information is an angel, and not just youth? What osnovyvaetsya this conclusion?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
This is not a drawing by Leonardo, and some kind of sleaze, it would be seen once the master's hand, and then some inconsistencies. Roughly drawn

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от SAH

Do you have allegorically comparison,: confused: Ur is when you realize the square of Malevich: cool:

Do you really think. that the most intelligent and accessible only to you the depth of knowledge! I think that Hurray! will be, when you realize that there are different points of view. And whose true - issue professional, philosophical and personal predilections ...