All the "compromises" with

[Seriy]

The problem of the standard in many forums and tried different versions of its solutions, including a special section, a forum for the elected, the creation of personal Subforums-chairs of the participants, in which they have the right to moderate.
Any good it did not result - in particular the sections there is no life, and a forum with dozens of individual departments, each of which may be wound up a similar theme, plus the same issue in an open forum - this is such nonsense ....- participate in one such .
 It should be noted that some faculty were provided not just for people - a popular forum, and people named in the offline-m e that have long-term credibility in real life, books, publications, awards and so on. Still, it turned out poorly, and these "stars" back in the open forum. Create department simply popular Members area is slipping on the level of the courtyard forum or a forum area - there are others.
  Again, there are LJ and people level Dmitry Vrubel, Marat Gelman enjoy all the features themselves, who want to moderate.
And I never met a delete messages from their LiveJournal on the occasion of unfavorable statements about the owner of the magazine. Because the authority Gelman can not destroy any attack Vasya Pupkin, on the contrary, the attacks set off, so skaat ..:-)
Moreover - Gelman brings together all the criticism in the network in your address, publishes it and commented on. The requirement to shield from criticism is childish, and not an adult approach, because it shows uncertainty and weakness in his position.
T e does not preclude anyone to start LJ and print everything in my head vzbredet.