All the "compromises" with
 

Posle svoego dobrovol'nogo uhoda s foruma, mnogie uchastniki obratilis' ko mne s pros'boi vernut'sia v lichnoi perepiske. Ia by eto s udovol'stviem sdelal, no u menia net ni maleishego zelaniia delit'sia informatsiei, slyshat 'ili terpet' uchastie mnoiu ignoriruemyh forumchan v moih temah.

Predlagaiu administratsii kompromiss: vy rasshiriaete funktsiiu ignor, do urovnia nevozmoznosti ignoriruemyh prinimat 'uchastie v moih temah, videt' ih i obsuzdat 'ih, ia ne vizu ih tem. po-moemu spravedlivo. Net?

Inache ignor kakoi-to odnobokii.

Togda ia s udovol'stviem prodolzu uchastie v forume.

Deistviia iunogo admina, daze ne hochu obsuzdat ', ne interesno.

I think it makes sense to ask about this Administration:
1), prof. topics will be less flooding
2) the forum will be less negative

Which makes :)

I join!

That is the level of self-esteem! But will there be promptly made public a list of rogue states?

This (or a similar theme) have discussed a year ago, the administration against the site .. created the community, blogs .. (partially solved the problem) .. So what you offer, the ideal option .. (to allow the author the right theme editor), but I doubt that the administration of the site go to it, perhaps it is technically difficult, perhaps other problems.

I agree and support.
I hope that this is a good reason why it has not yet been done.

On my own I can add the following: the site is very interesting, guys fellows, the forum is very interesting also, BUT the level of culture and quality of communication of individual participants, concerned exclusively selling its own waste paper, boorish vstrevayuschih all, without exception, talk - all this is hard to ignore and even harder to endure.

I have little free time and of course my desire to spend usefully, but if I see a flood in my temazh, unnecessary remarks - I come to the conclusion that it is better not to open the topic in general.
I have an opportunity to open a very interesting topic concerning the development of Middle Eastern art market at the moment - with the methodology, the names of the people that put art at Christie's auction and Phillips de Pury - in my opinion, this is very interesting and useful for the replication of the experience and its application to Russia's reality, and the general outlook, again until my themes gadili and shitting, I certainly prefer not to write.

The same forum! And for my own pleasure, to feel above, you can conduct private correspondence with Australia on an almost English, we fools reach Aboriginal language. In Australia, they also OOOO !:)

I think this problem can be solved technically as follows:

Alexander is given its own section, and limited rights and responsibilities of the moderator in it. Restricted - that is acting only in his section.
The fact that not suit Alessandro nick were not able to see this section - I think the speech should not go. It is their right and their same problems))). But remove them from there Alexander the message can. These discussions should not be duplicated or veiled continued in other sections. What sort of copyright on the subject.

Another option - to withdraw from the discussions in the "diary" Alexander (as well as another user, if they wish for their proposed topics). It is only necessary that in the diaries of the authors had the right to moderate his diary. Yes, this option is meaningful liturgy main forum. But this is the right forum administration to decide what it more profitable - to take the quality of the discussions or the number of posts in the statistics of the main forum.

Pavel, but I personally have no complaints to you, you are my subjects never wrote. Perhaps you have a claim to the other parties, which I know I can not and it is another matter.
If I say local artists I think it obvious that I do not mean all the artists present at the forum if something is not clear look, please, my profile, there is clarifying information.

At the right of bloggers to moderation, of course, there is. This is why blogs exist, that their authors were in their full-fledged masters of themselves and decided whom to admit into the discussion, and who not. Boss diary can even deny access to the diary, to whom he wants.