What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Причал]

Сообщение от Peter

professional do it can only another artist and then under the condition that his skill is not in doubt, as his authority for personal ispytuemogo.Togda and nelitsepryatno will be very polezno.Naschet effectiveness of such assistance from the art I doubt, for all their merits.

It's not that critics can not do it professionally.
The fact that the artists really better listen to other artists. This is especially true artists are not very young. There, for forty. Rather, even at fifty.
The relationship of artists to forty such that the judgments, they do not want to hear because of some jealousy, and listen there is not something special. Senior did not want to because little or no little /envy them, afraid of total carping, and irrational.

But art, in the bulk, and the truth to say anything sensible can not. Elderly do not want to (hurt, they are lazy, etc.). The young can not. Art Technology in universities were poorly taught recently and the day to devote to the development of artistic skills have stopped - had taken to the usual art school - to write, just like real artists the whole day a week, Pts. useful way.

Art Critic, which is necessary - to understand what they do - go to workshops.
 The All-around to this understanding if you want you can learn just for artists. It would be a desire.
I am not one of them drove. Well, I am a third year and worked as director of exhibitions at the House of the artist .