What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Причал]

Сообщение от LCR

Absolutely. Sometimes these attempts ...

These attempts were so long ago. In another life. In another coordinate system.
It was the world progressism.
And then the art world for a long time the rules of the criterion of novelty. Very long. He is still trying to defend (and wonderful when it at least for small sites can).
So now the novelty is impossible to surprise the viewer. Still less is it that the novelty of it can be frightening. His view of himself eagerly peering into the picture with a vain hope to be surprised, amazed, frightened. He is too inexperienced eye /information society is-se /and full of the flow of visual information (since there picture, television, advertising, and generally fuck up the whole does not allow a person to obtain a sensory deficiency, by the way necessary to some extent for the perception of fine art in general , any art bad-good if there).

Therefore, with the Impressionists is not correct.
Moreover I have heard them milen times and always on the subject .