The buyer and the artist: Ritual purchase

[SAH]

Originally Posted by Pavel

Akaki complexity and can not see you?

But not any complications can not be, and should not be. Kiril proilyustriroval well, with boys-oprichniki arts from all the complexity behind

Originally Posted by Pavel

You buy now and pay for it. Through kakoeto time you want to sell it. Selling and is that during this time it went up. You receive an increase to value and run and buy another two or three.

Paul all right, all right.
.

[kozhinart]

Originally Posted by Pavel

For something else all records of sales made known, it is essentially the ads Sotheby's, Drouot and other auctions.
And what difficulties and can not see you?

Added after 4 minutes
Ask yourself, why collect artifacts?

I asked and did not find an answer ....
Maybe the desire to possess so that more money?

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Pavel

For something else all records of sales made known, it is essentially the ads Sotheby's, Drouot and other auctions.
Akaki complexity and can not see you?

AleksandrG (rigorev) here once that the numbers count artists in the U.S. and Australia. I remind them: 3 million and 300 thousand corre-no. And how do you think, what we have? I think less than in Australia. At least once in 5. Do you agree? And people in our time in 5 more. And note, in line for pictures, no one is.

Added after 4 minutes

Originally Posted by Pavel

Ask yourself, why collect artifacts?

If we are talking about the artifacts - that causes mb so ICDO how and collectors!

[fross]

I think the ritual of the sale of works of art is still not quite trade rules and the artist has the right to invent any terms of the sale of their works. As an example, an English artist Janet Cardiff has refused to sell their product "Touch" (a wooden table, fairly rugged and scratches, touching which causes the voices and sounds of a bygone life, phone calls, music). She refused to sell the heiress of Baron Thyssen-Bornemisza, explained that she does not want her to work pylilos private mansion, and expressed willingness to sell it to the museum or at least a private foundation which supports contemporary arts and able to guarantee that the product will be displayed .. And what do you think the Baroness in the day registered the fund and this work became the foundation stock Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary known by the abbreviation TBA 21.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by kozhinart

I asked and did not find an answer ....
Perhaps the desire to possess so that more money?

Of course collecting what like those artists who like them. When the Impressionists came they did not want to buy one, so those rare fans who came to collect them in the history of art and left his descendants fortunes. Since then more sensible and has a 10x-20x respectively were killed not only flat but modelyanami and Goncharova and Malevich pr official art during the Soviet nebylo because every artist had the opportunity to do what he wanted, even neofitsialniki mainly fed by official orders. So make an informal collection. worth a penny.
In France, one in three of the artist, but not a professional, a lot of them but they are not on that do not pretend. Those who pretend to count on the fingers. If Alexander is referring to these fans that we have them still more. Same thing in America.
The question is not in the collection and the sale of collected. Can-Do you sell with us now in denominations of $ 5000000 that you are not cheated, robbed and you do not like to get your money?
Valuable than money, it is the investment.

If the state receives taxes from the sale at auction, it will protect the hen lays the golden eggs, it itself will protect the freedom to earn and would be interested in the growth of prices. In England the same pay tax at 50%, and sell at Sotheby's. When do we have more favorable conditions for all will sell and buy from us, and why these horror stories with masks show?

[kozhinart]

Originally Posted by fross

I think the ritual of the sale of works of art is still not quite trade rules and the artist has the right to invent any terms of sale of their works. As an example, an English artist Janet Cardiff has refused to sell their product "Touch" (a wooden table, fairly rugged and scratches, touching which causes the voices and sounds of a bygone life, phone calls, music). She refused to sell the heiress of Baron Thyssen-Bornemisza, explained that she does not want her to work pylilos private mansion, and expressed willingness to sell it to the museum or at least a private foundation which supports contemporary arts and able to guarantee that the product will be displayed .. And what do you think the Baroness in the day registered the fund and this work became the foundation stock Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary known by the abbreviation TBA 21.

In Russia, the so potupat opasno.Mozhesh himself get into this Yashiko .

[spigo]

Originally Posted by Pavel
Ask yourself, why collect artifacts?

Originally Posted by artcol

If it comes to artifacts

Guys! Fine artifacts expressed !

[Кирилл Сызранский]

spigo, "artifacts" is ar argument of-T fu! andfacts.

Added after 2 minutes

Originally Posted by Pavel

it will protect the hen lays the golden egg

I know. In a colony number 10 overall regime Krasnokamensk city of Chita region.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by artcol

Guys it is good artifacts expressed !

artifacts is a brief art. After all, you can collect anything and everything is sold at auction. So do the world.

[SAH]

Originally Posted by artcol

And note, in line for pictures, no one is.

Culture is not at altitude, the French paintings literally in every home, we have art is alien to the proletariat. I remember a political officer in the army (at that time were) said and what you do C. did you paint a picture that does work you at least one nail hammered?