"Russia's modern abstraction of secondary importance to define"

[Ваулин Алексей]

Chubarov different, in the early stuff (№ 1) can invest in the later (№ 2) no.
But why?
Please explain very interesting!!

And who else might be interested in an investment plan?

[Konstantin]

Chubarov different, in the early stuff (№ 1) can invest in the later (№ 2) no.
And why?
Please explain very interesting !!!!

Because the early stuff and expressive and recognizable. And after that they started on his promotion and in doing so he completely changed his painting. Then there were some exorbitant sales at auction, but was crudely done - they would be on a bit to add the price of the auction for the auction, and they (raskrutchiki) directly to hundreds of thousands of $ inflated ... And nothing. There was no general rise in prices for Chubarova not happen. We talked about this in detail (well, relatively) speaking at two seminars, "How to move the artist" and "Investments in modern art"

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Vaulin Alexey

Paul, and what this means: «not enough to make an abstraction, must be original»
And «all the development of abstraction have been exhausted» please explain, please, what about Eugene Mikhnov-Voitenko opened up new horizons in the abstract or very sharp Boris Turkish painter in its brevity, or Lydia Masterkova, Francisco Infante, Boris Markovnikov, or Sasha Ponomarev I will not mention the very young generation of artists?
In my opinion in the 21 st century as it is indecent to talk about the "originality" in art are all very closely intertwined

I know Turkish. Studied with him in the same year. The fact that he taught at Stroganovka does not mean severity of work. Rather, he always tried to show that he knows how to draw. But it is natural to school, but the monochrome images, and little expressive. I think that if you look at magazines and websites you can find a lot of things that have gone from one or the other artist. That would be nothing if artists grow in experience, but they are also trying to improve, do better neater, but if you look at all the famous artists are explorers, style, trends, etc. with the response they have not always very precisely because it is not allowed to taste and creative temperament. Great and great because they found its original way to be times when it seemed all intertwined and have an open and done, but there is Van Gogh, all of which are taught and can never learn to paint, which makes all awry, as Cezanne ....

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

I know Turkish. Studied with him in the same year.

You are about Boris Zakharovich say?
And where you studied with him? In Penza? In the 46-m? Or is the Moscow School in the 47-m?
I know that he is still from 1953 to 1959 he studied at the correspondence department of the Moscow Polygraphic Institute. They studied with him?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Pavel

I heard that Kandinsky was a mathematician and his abstraction is mathematically constructed compositions. He is a German artist and he has clearly read the influence of German expressionism.

Always something to someone who then has an impact! This is particularly true in relation to the time (early 20 th century), when all the bubbling and boiling! At the German Expressionists were influenced by the French Impressionists, but that they did not become French! Kandinsky, of course, the Russian artist! At least, he considered himself to be!

Kandinsky and proved himself as an abstract expressionist, and how, but the fact that he is the founder and theorist of abstract art, that's for sure.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I would only add that there is silent role of ancient art as a source of development of abstract art and modernism in general, but it is not surprising because of Western origin article. Consecrate this role remains to future researchers. (Although, of course, and now, such studies exist.)

I also think so.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от artcol

In the Bible there is no such prohibition. Are you confused with the Koran, probably.

Find out what iconoclasm and why. The Quran is the book of Allah, Allah is al-Yahweh or just Yahweh, which can not be described in Sue mention.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

Discover what iconoclasm and why. The Quran is the book of Allah, Allah is al-Yahweh or just Yahweh, which can not be described in Sue mention.

I know what iconoclasm, its causes, etc. Further can not continue - let's go back to the topic.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от artcol

I know what iconoclasm, its causes, etc. Further can not continue - let's go back to the topic.

This is the topic because it is one of the foundations of abstract art.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

This is the topic because it is one of the foundations of abstract art.

The ban on images of God and man as its similarity comes from canonincomprehensibility the first of his creation, from his some "nature.
A iconoclasm of the same opera, and that the destruction of the golden calf, etc.

Paul, a big topic, write about it here meaningless. If you want to understand better to turn to the literature or specialized forums. Abstraction for a ban on the image of God is very, very indirect and not directly related. This is closer to the music.