Glamor in the art

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Vivien

One Grandma replied that "glamor" - it is something related to the main Moscow criminal investigation

: D: D: D: D: D

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]
gigantic kitsch. The exhibition Jeff Koons at Versailles

"If you think of it, and all the current art - hepening. Its purpose - not the creation of artistic treasures, but a particular application, demonstration, declaration. And one more important element: artobektom appears not so much a product of how much the artist himself. Not as much an art how much image-making organization (obviously now in Russia the word). Or even more clear: PR. The modern artist has a PR - and not surprisingly, Jeff Koons at the beginning of his career, hired image-maker. But today's image-making organization is not limited to PR - the current art in its declarations and ideas can not be understood without the help of a professional art critic: these people are creating now promotion to the aesthetic market. That's the market: one work Koons sold for 23 and a half million dollars. And who had gone in his footsteps, and that Hurst made a hundred million on his diamond skull. sober critics say that contemporary art - kitsch for the rich. "

http://www.svobodanews.ru/content/article/467693.html

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Veronic

sober critics say that contemporary art - kitsch for the rich. "

And not just "rich" and the super-rich (toucans). Baudrillard well (understandably) obyasnyal.No he stated simply: art no (the west). But again, it is "on the other side" ... This is the (parallel) universes. Which began to come into contact, because toucans are now everywhere.

[L-ana64110]

In my understanding glamor \ in any genre, style \ - is the work figured in "beautiful" - ie the lack of subtext as the semantic and psychological, and kitsch is the same only on a mass equivalent

[Veronic]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

In my understanding glamor \ in any genre, style \ - is the work figured in "beautiful" - ie the lack of subtext as the semantic and psychological, and kitsch is the same only on a mass equivalent to

and the examples can be? By the way, to invent or find a subtext is always possible, if a little strain, of course.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]
interesting in my opinion article


The Pope wears Prada
As part of the ruling class hierarchy of the Church, of course, glamorous, says editor in chief of GQ
2008-09-03 /Stanislav Minin


Nikolai Uskov: "Whoever becomes the church officials, has the same qualities as any top manager."
 
The current period in the history of Russia's culture is often called "time of glamor. At the same time more often to hear that Russia is undergoing a "religious revival". Is there any connection between these two phenomena: the glamor and religion? On this subject, correspondent of "NRK" spoke with Nikolai Uskov, editor in chief of GQ magazine and historian medievalists, the author of the book "Christianity and monasticism in Western Europe in the early Middle Ages."
http://religion.ng.ru/art/2008-09-03/7_prada.html

[Yaya]

in fact, who does not like gl.redu magazine about "heifers" and trendy clothes to talk about the glamor of pontiffs?
Veronique, a specialist in Western medieval your respondent receives a "count". Pope has never been the vicar of Christ. Dad - vicar of St. Peter.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Yaya

Indeed, as someone not gl.redu magazine about "heifers" and trendy clothes to talk about the glamor pontiffs?
Veronique, a specialist in Western medieval your respondent receives a "count". Pope has never been the vicar of Christ. Dad - Vicar of St. Paul.

more words gl.red magazine about "heifers"

"I do think that the consumer society - the most harmless of all that ever existed. And the most positive. It is not based on hatred. A lot of ideology, including the national and statist, fueled by an inferiority complex. Hence, xenophobia, imperial ambitions, a spirit superiority. Now in the minds of most of Russia captured the ideology of success with all its material attributes. I do not see anything wrong and did not believe that everyone should read Dostoevsky. More than that, I am sure that Dostoevsky frequently read the ones who have all the good than those who have nothing. "Sociologists call it a pyramid Maslow - satisfying basic needs, people looking for new, non-material values in life."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

The Pope - Vicar of St. Paul.

Then, too, Peter.

[Yaya]

Cyril Syzransky, fu, O Lord, of course, Peter! He's a stone!

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
Veronic, yes, it feels puppy enthusiasm from the fact that a guy (that's an intellectual-it!) Finally discovered the pyramid Maslow! : D: D: D

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Yaya

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
Veronic, yes, it feels puppy enthusiasm from the fact that a guy (that's an intellectual-it!) Finally discovered the pyramid Maslow! : D: D: D

Maybe so lost skepticism, you need to personally gl.red magazine about "cows" to talk? : D

Сообщение от Yaya

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Veronic

the spirit of superiority.

Here are just a "superiority complex" of consumer society and are pushing hard all the cracks and holes, and where I did not appear that has not stopped ... He is so Vielha e Mijaran in the subconscious, even chtoim nevdoek that can not be just the "other" and values in general ..