Glamor in the art

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

At kitsch and glamor?
No, for me this stuff is the same order.

Do not tell me.
Winterhalter very glamorous, but not kitsch.

Glamour is in Zaryanko, but still an excellent artist.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Do not tell me.
Winterhalter very glamorous, but not kitsch.

Glamour is in Zaryanko, but still an excellent artist.

Igor Guriev, let us agree reinforce replica visual arguments. This time.
I do not know specifically what a "glamor" is a two
"Kitsch," I had used exclusively to mass production that Nicholson identifies as low art.
I'm going to watch Vinterkakegotam and Zaryanko ..
And for your "Glamour" is that?

Threat: and please. not taken out of context the secondary meanings of time-sorry for the "la-la", 100 times already kneaded this kitsch kitsch accident-free life is fresh and boring (Apropos) ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Winterhalter very glamorous, but not kitsch.

Winterhalter, Franz Xaver?
if you had it in mind, do not understand that it glamorous?, he was a court painter.
It's like Glamour began to appear as a style in the early 20 th century. But its founder, nevertheless, can be considered Klimt (although many forum users do not think so)

[NATA NOVA]

Igor Guriev, and Winterhalter posmotrela.Zoryanko This is pure High Art
if only the initials of artists set! (Academic you like!)
You misunderstood me completely.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Veronic

Winterhalter, Franz Xaver?
if you had it in mind, do not understand that it glamorous?, he was a court painter.

Well, then made a glamorous product.

A similarly named glamor-representation is later.

And what is this if not glamor?

And even Bryullova lack of glamor in some portraits.

Previously it was called "idealization."

[NATA NOVA]

But what Julie Winterhalter .. I found!
Recommend! (WOW!) Talking tables and desks-Skirts!
This probably is Glamour? (If I want!)

From the discussion move away .. to the tables Winterhalter .....
Threat: kitsch. probably (but what fun!) die-not get up!

Added after 53 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It used to be called "idealization."
     

Igor Guriev, assuming your promise, that Glamour is an idealization, then the whole socialist realism is the most glamorous "creative method"! (Because of nowhere, perhaps, not so much idealization and varnishing of reality)

[dedulya37]

You Danilo Fedorova though obzovite pot, but man does what he can. And it may well, in my opinion. He really lives a modern life, and therefore popular in certain circles.
The only difference is that he is without any intelligent thinking about the art of earning enough money to feel free. His mother, for instance, he's birthday gift "Jaguar" (this machine for the uninformed)
So it asks: "...and you could play a nocturne ...", expensive artists?
That same!

[NATA NOVA]

dedulya37, not about the money is speech and not about success, and Aro "Glamour in the art .. Expensive. You do not feel the difference ... And not "by means of art" ..
And thank God that makes ..
I you (not you specifically, but many) simply do not understand, every vyskazyvaenie or questions you as a painfully ... (probably used to the implication and manipulation ..
Do not need them in your protection ..
 Do I have to shut up and silent in a rag?
Whatever you ask. I will say that no-sheer misunderstanding ..
Schas comments will erase all your nafig!
and so again ask banned

[Veronic]

Сообщение от dedulya37

He really is living the modern life

Yes, and Glamour are now modern, or already outdated?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Veronic

glamor now modern, or already outdated?

Even if one is out of date anyway when something will be modern again, because everything is repeated waves, the only difference in the length of this wave.