Glamor in the art

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Stiff, stiff from the less fortunate and poorer counterparts. True, a hundred years that some glamor has become an art, and another - gone forever. Talent and glamor of a Great show.
In the catalog of the Pushkin Museum has paintings (they are in the reserves and never will not go there), which, according to the information under "Proishozhenie" cost in the early 20 century, several times higher than the Unsuccessful at that time the artists - Monet, Manet and others. Impressionists. Call those expensive predecessors N. Safronov no sense. They also no longer stand.

So it is better for the artist? Currency life or impoverished immortality?

For Veronique:

I wrote that the individual determination. And even the love of the masses is not always right. You like - Wear! Suits you - wonderful!
Place a photo of Klimt, or jewelry from FreyVille not see the point. Klimt all know and so, as best seen in the jewelry store on Tverskaya. Or at home - in Vienna. Who is closer.