Glamor in the art

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Grigory

Read l /s

All read, thanks.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от vadim

Rudeness? Or it seemed to me?

      You about it?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, I will not impose anything on you, God preserve me!
But to play in a musical comedy 56-year-Wow! Above, no!
Five minutes, five minutes,
Chimes will be heard soon ...(a)

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Vasiliev not otrylssya, but I did not like his jewelry. (It's glamor, glamor or bad kitsch? "And then. That he is" opened his mouth to Gurchenko "kitsch-like! (IMHO) Glamorous people themselves do not lead (IMHO) (or lead?)

Strange discussion. Vasiliev good artist, he works honestly in their subject - the history of costume and everything connected with it. Collects all that is connected with the topic. He lectures on the history of costume. He published excellent books about the beauties of the past ... On the true beauty ... All this required an honest passion. And he is a man who has a taste. Question on the topic under discussion should be put to him - he is in her specialist, professional ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от K-Maler

He published excellent books on the beauties of the past ... On the true beauty ...

Alexander Vasilyev - author of "Beauty in Exile", have passed the six editions - in 1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2005. - And translated into English in New York in 2000. In 1998 the book "Beauty in Exile" was named the best illustrated book of the year.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Grigory

Tjutchev, and after that you will regularly write that Kirill Syzransky offends you??
may be enough garbage to suffer? You own it in anyway trying to offend. And what is most interesting, nearly always without reason

  In the first post, I talked about the plebeians. What do you mean Cyril Syzransky?

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Yes, it is a tragedy - the falling star. What could be sadder and more beautiful? Although it is an occasion for the plebeians pohryukat.

  
In the second post, I just answered the same coin Cyril. After all, if a person admits certain expressions in the address of another person, he must understand that it can respond well. I think this is logical.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, I will not impose anything on you, God preserve me!
But to play in a musical comedy 56-year-Wow! Above, no!
Five minutes, five minutes,
Chimes will be heard soon ...(a)

   

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I understand your achievement - writing on the forum 2009 - the first? Above, no! : D

Сообщение от Grigory

Tjutchev,
may be enough garbage to suffer?

    Excuse me, but it seemed to me that this expression is too ekpsressivno. Although, maybe I am a bit old and dusty.

  Sincerely Tiutchev.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And for me so de Lempicka-glamorous ...

NATA NOVA, no Do not be rude ........

[Admin]

Member NATA NOVA bear a warning about the inadmissibility of such statements at the forum. In addition, the urge to communicate with other participants politely and "you". In the case of a repetition of such scandalous and provocative statements, your account will be blocked.

[Veronic]

A few works of Arthur Braginsky

[Вивьен]

Very delicate work, the pictures always visible nature and the inner world of the artist. Especially good in "Consuelo" in your album (Correct if I'm wrong).

[NATA NOVA]

All greetings! (Time difference NW hours from us)
 
About Lempicka. I do not think it is boorish and possibly. "spornoym vision.
(Madame Dali, too, in this company, which bought the expensive perfume instead of food for the child and kolaboratsionistka Chanel, which the fascists ........ "duzhila" (Even though their contribution to the world's cultural heritage) .. Here is a my NEGLAMURNY view (sorry, I have the right!)
"Suchizm" - (very often) the reverse side of glamor.(IMNO)

About Vasiliev. The book is magnificent. As an artist I do not know. Behaves unworthily. (IMHO)

Neckties. 1. îôôòîï, 2.Kitcha not as such. (so many times I expressed my point of view But good things in them (tie) - that no one wear them not zastavlyaet.Evgeny, thanks for the mention (in fact you do not think that's true ?) aolbom open to friends, the rest can be "vyguglit.
(theme "glamor in the art of" little hands HH (ITS) has become a kitsch-topic discussion infinite and deeply philosophical (IMHO)

"YOU" and "YOU" - see my profile. I respect these rules extremely difficult (especially compared to the permanent zadirok, reciprocal injections every psychological bites in the form of implications in almost 50%of posts) and where can I find out more, I do not quite understand. "(Here there is a" mental dissonance. ") Each person responsible for the style that expresses itself and quite estesstvenno if "heterogeneity" will not be able to integrate, it is quite normal that it will be torn. No problem. It's a very "natural."

It seems that all .. Dissatisfied ask (bravely) expressed lichku
All thanks.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 hours and 20 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Admin

Member NATA NOVA bear a warning about the inadmissibility of such statements at the forum. In addition, the urge to communicate with other participants politely and "you". In the case of a repetition of such scandalous and provocative statements, your account will be blocked.
     

Сообщение от Eugene

Quote:
Note from NATA NOVA
And for me so de Lempicka-glamorous ...

NATA NOVA, no Do not be rude ........
__________________
Eugene


Last edited by Eugene; Today at 09:06.

That's Google "bitch" in and declined as well. Izvinete friends, but "suchek" at least a dime a dozen, including in and glamorous. "Personally, I absolutely could not hurt anyone (in principle) .. , and boorishness (must be "rudeness" now poguglit) do not watch .. admit that a few decades ago it was "unprintable", but this attitude is outdated ... "Bitch, it is useful words now (as shown by my research) may be wrong sites looked-so let the right ..
 
and what is "account" have no idea.
and if not difficult, it is possible examples (mine) 1) impolite and 2) provocation?
And the fact without proof as that ..
 
Thank you.
   As for the "YOU-YOU", it is possible without the direct speech to do if Admin insists on a formal communication (although again, it amuses ME) may be because in the third person to communicate .. As admin thinks? even to old friends. Can Porobovati right before. (direct speech I do not overpower, even crack!)

                                            ------- End of official part ---

As for the topic "glamor in the art." I advise you to have a separate Veronica: "artist Alexander Braginsky."
And to complement this way: "Glamor and kitsch in art", because "de facto" she conform to this title ..
  be better, I think so ..
I wanted to say on the works, but among all this "rubbish" I consider it inappropriate and completely "neglamurnym" ...