How to call a general section on art?

[Admin]

So. That is, it is proposed to make two new sections? I understood correctly? One - on the theoretical aspects of art - that has previously offered Art-lover - and the second - like Art arbor, right? (may be called Art-Art-café or sofa to Arbor duplicate)

And what topics would fall into the theoretical aspects of art "- anyone can clarify? It is, in general, ovchinka candle? The theory of art, in my opinion, a very vague theme. There is a section of art direction - everything is clear. A simple "theory" - something incomprehensible.

[Yaya]

And just a "theory" - something incomprehensible.

Well not bad! : confused:
methodological framework for the analysis ikusstva
art-shaped system of art
Art in the structure of human activity
historical dynamics of the functions of art (I have about this thesis)

Yes it is, as they say, and a lifetime of little!

another thing that the great popularity of such a section, as it seems to me to use would not

[Admin]

Сообщение от Yaya

yes it is, as they say, and a lifetime of little!

another thing that the great popularity of such a section, as it seems to me to use would not be

I agree. Because the topic vague and direct perception of the work of artists who have a very indirect relationship. However, if you want to write about it and discuss it - please, can make such a partition.

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от LCR

territory theory - a lovely name, that's just incomprehensible that in this section to place, because the theory of art nobody here, except Art lover'a, like not working

And it heard from an art! Who've ever wondered "what is art?" Already - art theorist (not everyone likes to confess). And how many Dubin broken up in the battles between artodoksami () and aktualschikami!

Сообщение от Admin

And what topics would fall into the theoretical aspects of art "- anyone can clarify? It is, in general, ovchinka candle? The theory of art, in my opinion, a very vague theme. There is a section of art direction - everything is clear. A simple "theory" - something incomprehensible.

Сообщение от Yaya

another thing that the great popularity of this section, I think, will not enjoy

Well here is an example: Konstantin at the time made a topic "Spiritual in Art". Neither one of the existing chapters to such topics is not appropriate. The same can be said about the theme of the relationship of science and art (like the one that touched on, albeit not very successfully, mezon).
All this is not the theory of art - and his face, with the theoretical aspects. Thus, there is a need for a special zone where these facets and aspects (theoretical, psychological, scientific, mystical, and so on.) Can be discussed, and in such an extended setting it might be interesting to many people.

Accent on the word "theory" in the title of the section would not want to scare people - many on the word idiosyncrasy, and not from scratch ... But the costs should not obscure the point: to be a place where the multifaceted phenomenon of art would reflect in general, and interesting particulars.

And. All new and modern history of art - a history of development, interaction and control concepts, and to understand that in the areas of art is difficult, because dressing all this simmering broth is a naive general question - what is art (and what it is). Place for burning showdown on the relevance and traditional Thus - Also in this section. (and here you can transfer compliance. topic). Even questions of the art market in the most in general, theoretical formulation can be discussed here.

Thus, based on the content, and it should have been called something like: "Faces of Art" or "About the Art - aspects, opinions, positions, theories ...". (Or so - "About Art: Aspects, opinions, views, theories ...").

With regard to the potential popularity of the section, it samorazvorachivayuschiysya process: section appears to become manifest and drive.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Admin

The theory of art, in my opinion, a very vague theme.

Name the "territory of art"

[Glasha]

It seems to me, just have the same Pavilions highlight (or make) a separate site and call it:
Territory Art (what? Bad) or

Сообщение от Admin

can be called art-café or art diva

where will all these aspects and themes about art, but not suitable for any of the existing partitions

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

What are "territory of art"

And by the way, is quite acceptable if the subtitle of the section for clarification.

Сообщение от LCR

I think it is important to highlight topics of interest regardless of the time of their placement on the forum, in particular, for beginners on the forum, and put them somewhere where they would have been easy to find.

A? As you my idea?

The trouble here, that each its own view of the most interesting.
But anyone can create a diary section with annotated references to the "immortal" from his point of view, topics and posts, and thus share its vision of a better forum with others.
In this case, is useful that a big plus entries in his diary that you can edit and add unlimited period of time.

[Yaya]

Сообщение от Glasha

I think, just have the same Pavilions highlight (or make) a separate site and call it:
Territory Art (what? Bad) or
 
where will all these aspects and themes about art, but not suitable for any of the existing partitions

Glasha, and all other sections of the territory will not Art?
Art-lover, the title should be short and intelligible. It should contain the essence (ie the essence, rather than spatial clues, like the most interesting) content section. If we are going to do it in theory, the name and should be the word theory. Even if it's boring. While nothing in this boring, I do not see

[gans]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

What are "territory of art"

Like, just exactly characterizes the intended content. And it can be done subsection "Theory" or "theory of art."

[SergeiSK]

You can also resonate with the words to rename some sections of the forum. For example, Art-Terrarium "," Art-terrorism "," Terra-Art "...