How to unleash the artist (paper)

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

Those who bought the painting in this period are masterpieces or anything. To have or not have? Find and buy and do with sponsors and other well-wishers-robbers.

Paul, and you would like "to sponsors and other well-wishers-robbers" served the artist's free? That is, invested money, time, and even persuaded the artist to work and, if he has depression in this period?
Interestingly, someone met such people?

[AlexanderG]

A davaite raskrutim kakogo-nibud 'hudoznika ili dvuh, trioh prakticheski, po-nastoiaschemu! Mezdunarodnyi rynok uze predstavlen. Sponsorov poischem ....
Kto hochet pouchastvovat '?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от kropotkina-o

way of Gelmane.Pomnite have the history with the Minister Sokolov and "blue noses." Scandal was brilliantly used by all the rules of PR. Better present the "cultural" minister just could not do and, mind you, completely free of charge

You're wrong - correct to say is not used, as established by the Minister for PR. All this is financed from the budget.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Veronic

Paul, and you would like to "sponsors and other well-wishers-robbers" served the artist's free? That is, invested money, time, and even persuaded the artist to work and, if he has depression in this period?
Interestingly, someone met such people?

I knew, Durand-Ruel, Shchukin, Vollar-so anyone who was selling great. They received their for what they saw geniuses, and therefore money. Traders do not know how to draw. But now they are not traders and dealers, and artists without them anywhere to forget that few artists, and many traders.
  Sponsors are not free, and sponsors for their services to take pictures, which can be much more expensive care. I am against hypocrisy.

[AlexanderG]

Pavel, oni ne prodavali velikih, oni ih sozdavali.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Pavel, oni ne prodavali velikih, oni ih sozdavali.

If you mean the Shchukin and Morozov, yes. Due to the fact that they bought, they created a reputation for himself and place prime importance to artists. The same has built his reputation Appolinaire something that he praised it became expensive.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

little artists, and many traders.
Sponsors are not free, and sponsors for their services to take pictures, which can be much more expensive care. I am against hypocrisy.

But this is the most genuine hypocrisy. Are you looking for someone who would you buy and more expensive. Telling him to tall tales, that is when something will be very expensive. But in reality the price the artist makes only one who buys. И раскручивать ему будет Вас выгодно, если:
1. You really worthy of an artist;
2. If he bought you all - cheap;
3. Other personal nuances ...
And then, the artist should talk less and work more ...
I do not intend to help the artist. I can work with it (work) if it is interesting to me and if I cry, then music, извените, order ...

[Pavel]

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Veronic

Paul, and you would like to "sponsors and other well-wishers-robbers" served the artist's free? That is, invested money, time, and even persuaded the artist to work and, if he has depression in this period?
Interestingly, someone met such people?

The most honest-to buy from the artist's paintings, if they like, tie oboyudo-beneficial contractual relationship, to try to show it, to order his work. If you have someone's picture, advertise on all cylinders, even if you're an artist is not bound by the treaty, because if this artist vyrostet price, you win the material and get the glory that is the discoverer retutatsiyu connoisseur, which costs more money. For you will be seeking, all of your more expensive.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 6 hours 53 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Buscador

But this is the most genuine hypocrisy. Are you looking for someone who would you buy and more expensive. Telling him to tall tales, that is when something will be very expensive. But in reality the price the artist makes only one who buys. And untwist it will benefit you if:
1. You really worthy of an artist;
2. If he bought you all - cheap;
3. Other personal nuances ...
And then, the artist should talk less and work more ...
I do not intend to help the artist. I can work with it (work) if it is interesting to me and if I cry, then music, извените, order ...

If he bought for cheap, the artist will cheat and will repeat varied sold works, considering that such obazom compensates for the loss. In fact, a cheap work will remain cheap, the following work does not confirm the quality, the artist loses time and money. The artist is not having enough money can not work productively, they contain the same family, because the screw. As a result, neither ours not yours.
If you are going to dictate to the artist you get the same mediocre-Commercial art.
If an artist is worthy nadovesti deal adequately with the mutual agreement that is get the top ten
I think so, approximately

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

If you are going to dictate to the artist you get the same mediocre-Commercial art.
If an artist is worthy nadovesti deal adequately with the mutual agreement that is get the top ten
I think so, about

Zakzyvayu music - it does not mean talking like him to write (he no interest to me). This means that I propose to its terms

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 2 minutes[/color]
The most honest-to buy from the artist's paintings, if they like, tie oboyudo-beneficial contractual relationship, to try to show it, to order his work. If you have someone's picture, advertise on all cylinders, even if you're an artist is not bound by the treaty, because if this artist vyrostet price, you win the material and get the glory that is the discoverer retutatsiyu connoisseur, which costs more money. For you will be seeking, all of your more expensive.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 6 hours 53 minutes[/color]
If he bought for cheap, the artist will cheat and will repeat varied sold works, believing that such obazom compensates for the loss. In fact, a cheap work will remain cheap, the following work does not confirm the quality, the artist loses time and money. The artist is not having enough money can not work productively, they contain the same family, because the screw. As a result, neither ours not yours.
If you are going to dictate to the artist you get the same mediocre-Commercial art.
If an artist is worthy nadovesti deal adequately with the mutual agreement that is get the top ten
I think so, about

In general, I agree. Only those patrons so little in our time. Those who have money are buying mostly antiques. In the living artists invest rare. Although the case.

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Pavel

The most honest-to buy from the artist's paintings, if they like, tie oboyudo-beneficial contractual relationship, to try to show it, to order his work. If you have someone's picture, advertise on all cylinders, even if you're an artist is not bound by the treaty, because if this artist vyrostet price, you win the material and get the glory that is the discoverer retutatsiyu connoisseur, which costs more money. For you will be seeking, all of your more expensive.

The most honest - do their work. See - galereist should not tell the artist how to write (can only write that), and the artist teaches how to work galereistu what to buy, where to hang out, like advertising, etc. And the material welfare of the artist, too, has taken care of. Where is there - in the future. And today you buy it, for as long as he wants for the artist, published a catalog (album), advertise and more proslyvesh in the same bright future - grabber. An interesting collaboration. Gallery does not buy the painting (with rare exceptions), and sells them on mutually beneficial for both conditions.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Veronic

In general, I agree.

Therefore, I can not agree.