Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[Buscador]

Сообщение от voloviks

the phenomenon of art, on the kind of human activity, the need to create, to impress, surprise, etc., SSS saw in this episode art. Someone else see this as an original joke, but someone decided that was crazy and it sees and hears only one. But if you put it all in the gallery or museum, it will be recognized specifically as an art, not a joke. If you, for example, would make that your kitchen - all your friends would consider you a great original, Conceptual kitchen scale, to put on your street - the whole street will know what you conceptualist, and exhibitions, for example, in the Guggenheim Museum - the whole world recognizes you Conceptual artist. Here's a blunt way to glory.
I really liked the episode, described by SSS. And it was definitely shop second-hand equipment? )))))))))

I am certainly not against it. This original, fun, etc. And even in the museum can get, and somewhere else ... Here in my backyard one eccentric, conceptually, was to wash the car, spread out some spare parts around the yard. So he was very specific and clearly explained the concept, where his place along with his car ... Or take another example. Homeless man entered the store and began going through his three bags, perhaps, to do something conceptual. You understand the consequences of this action. In general, the homeless - people who think conceptually very, very much. They have so many unconventional decisions and actions ...
I think that art - conceptual or what else (the words that much and think you can mark any) - is a movement to the beautiful, the sublime ... And not in the opposite direction.
And I also liked the episode - described with taste.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от sss

Trying to advise or redo someone - an empty exercise. All are old enough and formed people. Moreover, for the present understanding of something, a little curiosity and a sincere desire for beauty. There are things that are not replenished nor education nor erudition, nor nauchaemostyu, otherwise, we would have eleven pieces, Pushkin, and not less V. Van Gogh

And here I can not agree. Objectives education is precisely clarified. Not plantation, and clarification. And if a person has a craving for beauty - it will reach certain heights. This is a one-way street. Unless, of course, this draft is ... And if the education we have today was at a level that in Pushkin's time, then sure, and talents would be born (manifested) more often.