Surrealism and the Surrealists

[Мунк]

Сообщение от Art-lover

I'm trying a lot of material on condensed to a few messages - so it was interesting and not tedious. The theory is useful to us to get away from fruitless disputes and seeking what is not. For example, surrealism, like schools.
To all these arguments and are going to come back to the artists and view their work with fresh eyes.

  Well, I will be patient. I even felt happy: it turns out, do you think of this trend in painting was not. And because I feel that somehow you are right. Because in the academic history of art it does not deign to attention (in the MSU program, RGGU it is often omitted if not enough time). I say "feel", because I can not yet say "know". If you have time, raising the literature. In the meantime, happy to honor you and see the wizard.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 17 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Meister

more artists to explore, the better.
I want your attention at present known in the West, but completely ignorant here, the artist Kay Sage (Kay Sage) (1898-1963). To me it works very even like)

In her pictures noticeable sustained motive - a drapery pull out. It looks like a hard shell. Sometimes - a veil that fetter the human figure. Sometimes the folds are fantastic architectural framework or landscape formations. But always drapery - a self-contained character. I wonder what kind of character? I like the most average in the bottom row of thing - where lying on the ground shell reveals a decayed skeleton, and in the conditional sky threatening its dominant viable twin. It seems that this is surreal vanitas. And the average in the top row of thing associated with the subject "Christ in the Desert."