Article about investing in art at RBC

[iside]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1841381"

No , why Gelman some extra advertising, and so he " byword "

Is also true. And suddenly it unwind in conjunction with Sotheby's as a future director of Russian Contemporary >

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1841381"

himself should " enter "

And this is the first rule of investment funds: invest only in one sector, which are good . Therefore, there can be no situation in investing in Nikas , although it is a quite incredible record [/URL], by the way, at Sotheby's. >

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

That's true too . And suddenly it unwind in conjunction with Sotheby's as a future director of Russian Contemporary >

And this is the first rule of investment funds: invest only in one sector, which are good . Therefore, there can be no situation in investing in Nikas , although it is a quite incredible record[/URL], by the way, at Sotheby's. >

Well, someone has already invested he

[iside]

artcol, Tin and gloom ....It sold Gysin and computer picture painted by the same Safronov. It turns out that the artist drew them seem to be himself . But can we attribute this work to a work of art? Can I call this picture a fake ? >

Minister of Internal Affairs of Russia Andrei Dunaev, paid for the portrait of Putin Nikas written two thousand dollars

Something cheap Putin of some kind. >

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

artcol, Tin and gloom ....It sold Gysin and computer picture painted by the same Safronov. It turns out that the artist drew them seem to be himself . But can we attribute this work to a work of art? Can I call this picture a fake ? >


Something cheap Putin of some kind. >

The story began with the fact that Dunaeva burned house, and it was his portrait painted by the Great Nikas GGG And when the insurance experts evaluated the affected property , the masterpiece they appreciated very cheap , much cheaper than paying for it Dunaev (there already was a substantial amount , not 2 , etc.). When Dunaev indignant about such a low rating , then told him about the technology of production ( not a masterpiece burned to the ground ). Dunaev oserchal and ran the rest of the masterpieces to take back . And did not burn down a house - prices would grow and grow on the creation of Nikas , and would buy all sorts of further Dunayev . And now to buy , I know of .

[mihailovoh]

Сообщение от Artdealer

does not , it is not logical . This is the same , that invest in stocks only those companies that enjoy ))) ) I like the Pepsi-Cola, not Coca-Cola, will be invested in Pepsi))) so the market would be cool living )))

 In Bafed and makes life - buys to.chto like - us would be Bafedami
Buy to.chto vygodno.udel dillerov.galleristov professionals is their job and they do not necessarily love to.chto like customers.
If there is a "taste" , and will be beneficial not without investitsii.konechno oshibok.dlya it all and learn all my life.