Article about investing in art at RBC
 

http://top.rbc.ru/economics/10/11/2011/624299.shtml

Well that's why, when writing about art , one must tell a story about the filth antiques ? How is tired of this PR contemporary art.
It is extremely strange message Gelman - that auctions are the guarantors of authenticity as opposed to galleries. On the contrary, auctions must sell what they produce , and serious galleries, valuing his reputation, carefully picked works of art for sale, and return to work in the gallery, much easier than at auction .
In addition to the art may be invested without knowing it , and it does not have to like it. It has long been clearly established who and how much is absolutely clear who and how will grow in value.

Here this need for investors to remember:

no, it's not logical.
This is the same, that invest in stocks only those companies that enjoy)))) I like the Pepsi-Cola, not Coca-Cola, will be invested in Pepsi))) so the market would be cool cores)))

Article badly wrong (ugly logic to fit the overall theme).
Too bad that was published at RBC - many people will be misinformed.
In terms of - just "TV" of some kind.

Well, and how to buy neponravivshuyusya thing?
:)>

Added after 55 seconds
With stocks can not compare - nothing about it I do not know at all.

Let's say you do not like Picasso. But who's to say that this is a bad investment? or do not like you Rayonism Larionov - is also a bad investment?

But like you but Nikas Safronov (just really like) - it is a good investment?

These things can not be allowed .
 :)>
And so this is all the more.
____________
Not very examples: people who love Nikas Safronov , and investment in art is not engaged, they write songs about it and they sing:

According to its liquid composition sluggish article reminded obychnuyuyu advertising. Sotheby's advertised and Art Finance, as a reliable firm to invest in art , as well as protection against counterfeiting. Is not entirely clear as there was Gelman, but perhaps specifically added it as a blind .
Marina Sitnina + "Art Finance" in the aggregate mentioned 5 times ( once as Sitina )
Mikhail Kamensky, Sotheby + mentioned 4 times
Gelman (once as Galman ) a total of 6 times

Hmm , maybe advertising as an art Gelman Advisory and Finance Art and Sotheby's contrary to dilute the material. :)>

Cyril has a true view of the need to be sure of things , and to do it , as necessary , no not a sufficient condition to enjoy yourself.

Threat in the article itself , of course , there is a robust grain.

Not , why Gelman some extra advertising, and so he " byword ". And how will you buy neponravivsheesya you * Listen advisers ? They nasovetuyut ...
Most have to " enter " and therefore all investors eventually grow into experts and even specialists with impeccable taste, a wonderful feeling and a strong sense of anticipation.
 In our market are many such examples .