Article about investing in art at RBC - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Artdealer · 10.11.2011, 12:59

http://top.rbc.ru/economics/10/11/2011/624299.shtml

Well that's why, when writing about art , one must tell a story about the filth antiques ? How is tired of this PR contemporary art.
It is extremely strange message Gelman - that auctions are the guarantors of authenticity as opposed to galleries. On the contrary, auctions must sell what they produce , and serious galleries, valuing his reputation, carefully picked works of art for sale, and return to work in the gallery, much easier than at auction .
In addition to the art may be invested without knowing it , and it does not have to like it. It has long been clearly established who and how much is absolutely clear who and how will grow in value.

Кирилл Сызранский · 10.11.2011, 13:57

Here this need for investors to remember:

Цитата:

" In general, the basic principle of investing in art comes down to what you have to buy only what you like , and only the best of what you can afford. Do not try to be just an investor, become a collector, then your investment will be successful in any event "- summarized AM Sitnina .

Artdealer · 10.11.2011, 15:26

no, it's not logical.
This is the same, that invest in stocks only those companies that enjoy)))) I like the Pepsi-Cola, not Coca-Cola, will be invested in Pepsi))) so the market would be cool cores)))

Vladimir · 10.11.2011, 15:26

Article badly wrong (ugly logic to fit the overall theme).
Too bad that was published at RBC - many people will be misinformed.
In terms of - just "TV" of some kind.

Кирилл Сызранский · 10.11.2011, 15:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artdealer

no, it's not logical.

Well, and how to buy neponravivshuyusya thing?

>

Added after 55 seconds

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artdealer

invest in shares of only those companies

With stocks can not compare - nothing about it I do not know at all.

Artdealer · 10.11.2011, 15:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1841231"

Well, and how to buy neponravivshuyusya thing ?

Let's say you do not like Picasso. But who's to say that this is a bad investment? or do not like you Rayonism Larionov - is also a bad investment?

But like you but Nikas Safronov (just really like) - it is a good investment?

Кирилл Сызранский · 10.11.2011, 15:50

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artdealer; 1841261"

Let's say you do not like Picasso. But who's to say that this is a bad investment? or do not like you Rayonism Larionov - is also a bad investment ?

These things can not be allowed .

>

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artdealer; 1841261"

And here you like but Nikas Safronov (just enjoy )

And so this is all the more.
____________
Not very examples: people who love Nikas Safronov , and investment in art is not engaged, they write songs about it and they sing:

iside · 10.11.2011, 17:21

Цитата:

Сообщение от Vladimir; 1841221"

Too bad that was published at RBC - many people will be misinformed . In terms of - just "TV" some

According to its liquid composition sluggish article reminded obychnuyuyu advertising. Sotheby's advertised and Art Finance, as a reliable firm to invest in art , as well as protection against counterfeiting. Is not entirely clear as there was Gelman, but perhaps specifically added it as a blind .
Marina Sitnina + "Art Finance" in the aggregate mentioned 5 times ( once as Sitina )
Mikhail Kamensky, Sotheby + mentioned 4 times
Gelman (once as Galman ) a total of 6 times

Hmm , maybe advertising as an art Gelman Advisory and Finance Art and Sotheby's contrary to dilute the material.

>

artcol · 10.11.2011, 17:33

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artdealer

Let's say you do not like Picasso. But who's to say that this is a bad investment? or do not like you Rayonism Larionov - is also a bad investment?

But like you but Nikas Safronov (just really like) - it is a good investment ?

Cyril has a true view of the need to be sure of things , and to do it , as necessary , no not a sufficient condition to enjoy yourself.

Threat in the article itself , of course , there is a robust grain.

Кирилл Сызранский · 10.11.2011, 17:49

Цитата:

Сообщение от iside; 1841341"

and maybe advertising as an art Gelman Advisory

Not , why Gelman some extra advertising, and so he " byword ".

Цитата:

Сообщение от artcol; 1841371"

Kirill , right view is to be sure of things , and to do it , as necessary , no no sufficient condition to enjoy yourself.

And how will you buy neponravivsheesya you * Listen advisers ? They nasovetuyut ...
Most have to " enter " and therefore all investors eventually grow into experts and even specialists with impeccable taste, a wonderful feeling and a strong sense of anticipation.
In our market are many such examples .

10.11.2011, 12:59	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
Artdealer Местный Регистрация: 12.04.2008 Сообщений: 191 Спасибо: 102 Поблагодарили 92 раз(а) в 46 сообщениях Репутация: 87	Article about investing in art at RBC http://top.rbc.ru/economics/10/11/2011/624299.shtml Well that's why, when writing about art , one must tell a story about the filth antiques ? How is tired of this PR contemporary art. It is extremely strange message Gelman - that auctions are the guarantors of authenticity as opposed to galleries. On the contrary, auctions must sell what they produce , and serious galleries, valuing his reputation, carefully picked works of art for sale, and return to work in the gallery, much easier than at auction . In addition to the art may be invested without knowing it , and it does not have to like it. It has long been clearly established who and how much is absolutely clear who and how will grow in value.

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Investing in junk art	Seriy	Investing in Art	9	26.03.2010 23:17
Investing should be in the fact that more money	NATA NOVA	Chatter	22	01.12.2009 16:10
Is it worth investing in this work?	Anna Ivanova	Costs, valuation, attribution	10	23.11.2009 15:18
Investing in art: the profit for the patient	nikola	Investing in Art	21	11.04.2009 07:14
Investing in crisis	LCR	Investing in Art	3	30.10.2008 00:58

10.11.2011, 15:26	Язык оригинала: Русский #3
Artdealer Местный Регистрация: 12.04.2008 Сообщений: 191 Спасибо: 102 Поблагодарили 92 раз(а) в 46 сообщениях Репутация: 87	no, it's not logical. This is the same, that invest in stocks only those companies that enjoy)))) I like the Pepsi-Cola, not Coca-Cola, will be invested in Pepsi))) so the market would be cool cores)))

10.11.2011, 15:26	Язык оригинала: Русский #4
Vladimir Гуру Регистрация: 20.03.2008 Сообщений: 8,085 Спасибо: 3,353 Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 250 Репутация: 23529	Article badly wrong (ugly logic to fit the overall theme). Too bad that was published at RBC - many people will be misinformed. In terms of - just "TV" of some kind.