Question?

[Самвел]

Today nadtknulsya on, and so the question arose as to be on this forum, if you suddenly want to criticize, to say that well, so the artist himself, nothing special, but the artist is no longer young, made a show, well tried, and it feels like the community forum, what to do, what to do. Write what you think or net.Promolchat, not to spoil the theme, even if it's a personal opinion?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Samvel

keep silent, not to spoil the topic, even if it's a personal opinion?

Well, if you specifically asked, answer it.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Samvel

Today nadtknulsya on the topic, and so the question arose as to be on this forum, if you suddenly want to criticize, to say that well, so the artist himself, nothing special, but the artist is no longer young, made the exhibition, well tried and like the community forum like what to do, what to do. Write what you think or net.Promolchat, not to spoil the theme, even if it's a personal opinion?

Competent critics have not been harmful to anyone.

[NEO]

There is a notion of tact, as if to explain, if necessary.
Rejection of an artist you do not fatally? But perhaps, at his age is extremely dangerous to criticize the (whole life in an empty) for health. What do you prefer - defending their views, knowledge and understanding of painting or health /life of another person?

[boudini]

As for criticism it should be done in a most human, compassionate form with respect to all personal achievements and accomplishments.

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от Samvel

Today nadtknulsya on the topic, and so the question arose as to be on this forum, if you suddenly want to criticize, to say that well, so the artist himself, nothing special, but the artist is no longer young, made the exhibition, well tried and like the community forum like what to do, what to do. Write what you think or net.Promolchat, not to spoil the theme, even if it's a personal opinion?

Of course, every artist considers himself a genius. However, as every writer. Without faith in yourself you can draw a signboard or a lifetime to keep a diary. Create - is impossible.
But this - the problem of the artist (writer), but not others.

Simulate the situation. Suppose I decided to invest my money earned in the work of the artist, after reading entirely positive responses to the topic at the August body. And not on the anniversary of the artist or his death. Taking everything at face value, because they write very experienced professionals.
Based on the fact that they write these professionals exactly what they think about the work, but not the identity itself of the artist.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[/QUOTE]
And this is looking at what section of the forum came to your question.

If the author shows his work, too, can have different opinions.
Someone looking at work, they may be interested in, someone they will remain indifferent, someone does not like. No reason, I believe, and I say nothing.

You remember the theme of the works of British Hirst or Cheka our Malevich, opinions were different, the spores were sharp, hot. And the investment?
How is it possible to taste other people's plans to invest their money? [/URL], etc.
Yes, and even conducted seminars this resource, there is a lot of art investment can be found.
There is a site and a large base which contains information on more than 95 000 deals with the works of Russian artists, including works by representatives of the Russian abroad. The database includes more than 4900 artists.
You can determine the investment, I think.
Let the very problem of multiplying your money will be your problem. No?

A forum for the other, for live communication, exchange views, news, to provide feasible help some answers to questions from the participants ...

[Любознательный]

Cyril Syzranskiy,

The situation that was invented by me, typical collector birochek.
Personally, I like not threatened.

Birochniki buy not to your liking (for fun), but on the advice of specialists for their money (investments). That you know very well.
So much of your post is not relevant and not on the topic.
Anyway, I took his question this way.
I thought and still think that the truth - more expensive.
That is what I wrote.
Despite the different responses to the question of Samvel.
Because I think so, but not otherwise.
That is discussed?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

You wrote this:
You have to define yourself, what you need painting.

[Fed]

So, if you refer to the Gospel, the discussion of artists (sound) - is appropriate.

Ie-pornography , not paintings.