11.09.2010, 20:23
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#21
|
|
Новичок
Регистрация: 10.05.2010
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 22
Спасибо: 5
Поблагодарили 21 раз(а) в 9 сообщениях
Репутация: 42
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy
And what of it?
Well, call me, for example, someone "outstanding" or "great." I broke the written rules? My opinion is, I think. Someone will hear me, laugh to myself at my naivety, but someone will remember the artist's name and then ask about them separately, might open this author to himself.
Nothing serious in this, perhaps, exaggerated comparisons.
Sometimes, I noticed, however, add to these comparisons is the phrase "his time", as if clarifying, limiting the time frame the present context.
|
Uh-huh. and place such great shtetl. Well, too variant. //And on the other hand, that the words sorry ... Overcoming the resistance of the material deserves respect.
Added after 4 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Tata
It is surprising ease with which many participants in the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?
|
If you honestly and frankly, something from me a kind word rarely hear )))))
|
|
|