Продам: Selling M. Roginsky, V. Pushnitsky, Yu Tatyanin.

[Galina]

Сообщение от LCR

No, Jack, I talked about other jobs, and history, which I have described and that you quote, came later, in early 2008

In any case, Galina is a bona fide purchaser, and it can not be any complaints.

My advice, however: the work in Roginsky Popova not buy, now he does not have any pictures nehischennoy Roginsky.

Works have been acquired in 2005 ArtMoskve. I am a bona fide purchaser. One of the few. Sincerely, Galina.

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Eugene

Dear Liana, thank you very much for your reply .. I understand, good luck "Galina" in the sale ..

Dear Eugene, my name is Galina. Not a fan of Internet communication, and new to the forum does not mean new to the profession and among collectors. I do not think you would want to assert itself as irony, if accompanied by the name and surname. Sincerely, Galina.

Added after 14 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

No, Jack, I talked about other jobs, and history, which I have described and that you quote, came later, in early 2008

In any case, Galina is a bona fide purchaser, and it can not be any complaints.

My advice, however: the work in Roginsky Popova not buy, now he does not have any pictures nehischennoy Roginsky.

Dear Lina, thank you very much for your reply. Repeatedly asked Popov introduced us. Thought and still think that the legacy of a great artist should not be fragmented. Was ready for it to knock out the federal program. Alas, time has been lost, the situation changed. I wish you good luck and very happy to let him in absentia and familiarity. Sincerely, Galina.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Galina

was ready for it to knock out the federal program.

How's that?
On the purchase of works of Roginsky gos.zakroma?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Galina

was ready for it to knock out the federal program.

No, you do not need my name "attached" to the name, have pity on Eugene.

[тата]

It is surprising how easily many of the participants of the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?

[Galina]

Сообщение от Tata

It is surprising ease with which many participants in the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?

Mikhail Roginsky in my opinion man, tortured fitter climbed slightly higher than just the history of Russian painting of the second half of the 20 century. His level of creative thinking went beyond the historical framework. It is not only a reflection on the scoop, not just artistic interpretation of reality, and not even thinking about eternity available to him an artistic language. Roginsky finally can then think about the arts, new forms and means of expression, the very language of art, the relevance of most of easel painting in the modern world. And he succeeded. He is primary. So I find it a great artist.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Tata

It is surprising ease with which many participants in the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?

For Surikov, perhaps - yes, fit.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Tata, 1271131

It is surprising how easily many of the participants of the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists.

And why not?
Well, call me, for example, someone "outstanding" or "great." I broke the written rules? My opinion is, I think. Someone will hear me, laugh to myself at my naivety, but someone will remember the artist's name and then ask about them separately, might open this author to himself.
Nothing serious in this, perhaps, exaggerated comparisons.
Sometimes, I noticed, however, add to these comparisons is the phrase "his time", as if clarifying, limiting the time frame the present context.

[Galina]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

And what of it?
Well, call me, for example, someone "outstanding" or "great." I broke the written rules? My opinion is, I think. Someone will hear me, laugh to myself at my naivety, but someone will remember the artist's name and then ask about them separately, might open this author to himself.
Nothing serious in this, perhaps, exaggerated comparisons.
Sometimes, I noticed, however, add to these comparisons is the phrase "his time", as if clarifying, limiting the time frame the present context.

Uh-huh. and place such great shtetl. Well, too variant. //And on the other hand, that the words sorry ... Overcoming the resistance of the material deserves respect.

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Tata

It is surprising ease with which many participants in the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?

If you honestly and frankly, something from me a kind word rarely hear )))))

[SAH]

Сообщение от Galina

If you honestly and frankly, something from me a kind word rarely hear )))))

 
......

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Galina

Uh-huh.
and place such great shtetl.

Yes, and the place too.

"An outstanding artist Smolenschiny" or "a great artist of Tatarstan" ...