11.09.2010, 19:44
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#14
|
|
Новичок
Регистрация: 10.05.2010
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 22
Спасибо: 5
Поблагодарили 21 раз(а) в 9 сообщениях
Репутация: 42
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Tata
It is surprising ease with which many participants in the forum award epititami type: Great, brilliant, outstanding, even very good artists. Great, ideal for Repin, Surikov, Serov, but if so call Sudeikina, Labasa or Mav, this is wild and funny. Nobody do not call P. Williams or Adlivankin great. If we use this terminology, all modern artists, and then the genius of the great (Bulatov, Dubosarskiy, Nesterova, Weisberg Nemukhin, Vulokh, Masterkova, Nazarenko, etc. etc. The list as you should be able to resume.) Or at least the artists listed great than ...?
|
Mikhail Roginsky in my opinion man, tortured fitter climbed slightly higher than just the history of Russian painting of the second half of the 20 century. His level of creative thinking went beyond the historical framework. It is not only a reflection on the scoop, not just artistic interpretation of reality, and not even thinking about eternity available to him an artistic language. Roginsky finally can then think about the arts, new forms and means of expression, the very language of art, the relevance of most of easel painting in the modern world. And he succeeded. He is primary. So I find it a great artist.
Последний раз редактировалось Galina; 11.09.2010 в 19:52.
|
|
|