Art totalitarian

[SergeiSK]

Something many of you bulk The dispute alone does not want to, although in the evaluation of the above, I am not alone, as many think. After all I conclude the dispute:

Сообщение от sss

What is the ideology of a "Lilac" Konchalovsky?

It was not about the ideology of the authors and painting, but about idelogicheskih views in the dispute.

Сообщение от sss

This is a historical, political, whatever the cut, affecting the culture of one country, and to the world cultural processes, he has nothing to do.

Is of direct relevance to the development of the world of realistic painting in 1930-60 GG

Сообщение от sss

Let us then you have a grown-up - with Van Gogh, Schiele, Modigliani ...
I'm afraid, only one Morandi, speaking of the contribution to world culture, will outweigh all the popular and highly respected together.

Yeah once with Leonardo and Raphael! Well, or Mukhin Vucheticha compared with Giacometti.

Сообщение от sss

Nonconformists are interesting not because they fought with socialist realism, but because, being excluded from official culture and fenced off from the modern world of artistic processes that gave rise to being in this confined space, something new and that most valuable personality.

You can also say that the USSR in isolation from the rest of the world, spawned in the same enclosed space for the country, its kind of art - Socialist Realism, public art.

Сообщение от artcol

shl You know that expression "the square-cluster method"?

This is selhozforum, they will tell

All ... I think once again the dispute meaningless. No anyone here does not prove anything. Time will put everything in its place ...