|
|||||||
| English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
| Costs, valuation, attribution Discuss artworks’ prices and attribution. |
| Результаты опроса: Считаете ли вы Марка Ротко новатором? | |||
| Да |
|
38 | 34.23% |
| Нет |
|
36 | 32.43% |
| Сомневаюсь |
|
26 | 23.42% |
| Ничего не знаю о Марке Ротко |
|
11 | 9.91% |
| Голосовавшие: 111. Вы ещё не голосовали в этом опросе | |||
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #3 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Without the genius of the PR will not help. Naked PR blown off in a few years, and Rothko grows and grows. Simply there are more people who understand it. Recently watched an interesting investigation into the heritage of Rothko. He bequeathed his works to the Fund, which has entrusted to dispose of three of his friends (as he believed). In the end, after the death of his assigned work and as a result of a simple scheme of their cheaply bought Marlborough Gallery - himself famous Lloyd. Per cap crumbs. An example is given when bought now for 12 thousand, and almost immediately sold more than 200 thousand. In general was quite damaging scheme. But then another 19 letnayaya Rothko's daughter filed a lawsuit. It lasted for several years. Marlborough was found guilty, imposed a multimillion-dollar fine, ordered the return unsold paintings. Interesting story, you will need to dig at leisure.
|
|
|
|
| Эти 16 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение: | cayman (22.04.2008), eva777 (26.07.2009), ivan-msk (28.09.2013), Jasmin (24.07.2009), K-Maler (28.07.2009), lusyvoronova (07.05.2010), Martin (03.12.2009), Ovk (30.03.2011), SAH (24.07.2009), Santa (30.03.2011), silent (08.05.2010), sur (07.05.2010), Yaya (24.07.2009), Аркадий (28.09.2015), Зея (16.10.2012) |