Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates!

[Nedogonov]

Сообщение от Art-lover

The pathos of these guardians of the common good is always directed to the protection of Truth, Goodness and Beauty. But for some reason, these high values of such patronage are beginning to look as if they had not really soaked in formalin, and in cadaveric poison. Where there shalunishke Hirst with his cows.

And I knew, Art-lover, that you will find time to answer my reply! And apparently I am not alone - your fan on this site (judging by the abundance of thanks at the bottom of your post, where as the Western Wall came your fans).

So that's what he's like - a local Joshua!

You disappoint me at once, however. Infinite, the sad (as in bench starevschitskoy) shaking up quotations and falsification of facts. And then, after a shamefaced retreat

 

«putting the question logically implies the following:»

  - Should flow with the gag "curls", generally have no meaning and intended only for "a grateful audience."

Or another "gem":

could point by point to show that almost all that Nedogonov wrote on themes of art, or false, or tendentious stretch, or an empty platitude

You - so prove it. For example, I, too, could easily prove that the Art-Lover - not man!

You are not lazy nadergat quotes from my post. Alas, only this unoriginal, manipulative Admission (favorite weapon Media-shnyh hack writers) and you have learned.

For example, as in your "list Art-lovera», intended to accuse me of obscurantism, horrible phrase "heresy Judaizers, legalized in scientific usage? This is to ensure that when you could call me an anti-Semite? This calculation only on the dropouts.

With this "secret weapon" even the greatest monuments of human culture can turn into the extremist works, using only the quotes and not explaining the surrounding context.

Читать дальше... 

«When close to the city, to fight with him ... lay siege against it. And give it to Hashem, your Elohim, in thine hand, and smite with the sword all his men. Only women and small children, and cattle, and all that will be in town, all the spoil thereof, take me, and the spoil of thine enemies, that Hashem, your Elohim, gave you. So deal with all the cities, distant from you is ... do not leave a single living soul, for a ban puttest you to them - to the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, prizeev, Jivi and the Jebusites, as commanded thee One, your God ... "(" Devarim », 20:10-18).
Well, this passage from the Torah, intended for the weekly readings (in our time already), calls for genocide? Of course not! So in my post there's absolutely nothing that you attributed to me and what I was trying to defame.

But the main thing is not even. The main thing that you consistently leads the question away from the essence of my message, which is limited to the following simple terms. I will cleanse them of unnecessary words (head shaved when stung lice, so that lice had nothing to grab):

• I do not like when exhibited in museums or excrement poured herself with them and call it art.
• I do not like when people are shitting in museums, public masturbate, copulate with animals and also call it art.
• I do not like it when art is called The Crucifixion with the Order of Lenin, replacing head Redeemer.
• I do not like when I was convinced that the form issued by the intestines "helps focus the masses (sparking zhargonchik where?) On the eternal, divine and humane" ...
  
• * * * * * * * * *
• I also do not like it when all this filth "triumphant march" ...
• Finally, I do not like the fact that my grandchildren, as well as grandchildren, other people can believe in this nonsense as a result of your efforts.

Here, in fact, all the ideas that I could not speak in conciliatory terms, and that you were "devastating" criticism. Do not zaporashivat their Dostum your umnichanya. In the topic for me, as I could, tried to explain them. Everything else is just invented you. He who has eyes, let see!