Russian week in London

[LCR]

Сообщение от Tana

artcol you know, I can not call myself a 100%lover and an admirer of socialist realism (because not like everything and not all), because Besides, I love classical Russian painting, the Impressionists, I love Russian avant-garde (but not all in a row, have favorite artists and works) and nonconformists like (although most units), and I do not understand how some forum members dumped into the pile of all the artists who worked in Soviet times and call it junk, is precisely for political reasons, they say worked to order and indulge the regime with everybody and saying nothing to look as "pearls" (which I oboschila their statements), that does not agree with this as soon as possible !!!!! love tolko one thing in art, how can you be such a "unilateral"?

Tanya
I think this is a typical problem of cyber-forum - lots of information scattered in different branches.

I am absolutely confident that if anybody will collect statements of the forum on the socialist realists (but this is a purely theoretical assumption, since no one will make this huge and, in general, sterile work) in different subjects, it will be possible to make sure that wholesale overtones of Soviet artists there.

Specifically, I wrote about his love for Deineko, when were talking about it. I'm awfully fond of Paul Kuznetsova, I really like Schr, Volkov, and many others, but this I did not say, because why anyone should be concerned with my love for a particular artist, but interesting to me to tell them nothing. It is also to ensure that those who talk about his love for the nonconformists, like, maybe much more - small Dutch, for example, or Magnasco, or El Greco (it all - one of my most expensive), but they simply could not be case to tell about it.
In addition, because zde investment forum, the majority of its members are somehow connected with the sale of paintings, and I always think long before you put any material not directly related to that subject, because I'm afraid that he would be considered superfluous or uninteresting or even irrelevant ...

Love all nonconformist, in my opinion, it is simply impossible, I already said (I apologize - but communication on the Internet requires many repetitions, as one does not read all the messages: )) that the name "nonconformists" aesthetically and stylistically neutral, it simply brings together artists who worked outside the official system - although some of them - Tselkov, Kropiwnicki father and son, Tiapushkin, my husband - were members of SC).

In my understanding, the term "socialist realism" denotes all the gigantic and anonymous mass of artists who painted in the plant, prazdenstva, etc., and nekakogo interest or sympathy, they do not cause me.