Question?

[Tana]

Сообщение от Samvel

There is a second question, which comes from the first, this interrelation in this forum. After expressing his negative opinion about the artist, willy nilly stanovishsya not be construed undesirable for the artist, but also spoil the relationship with those who represent the artist. But already there were certain, virtual relationships between people, and I like some know who I was, or my theme support, and can no longer be independent in their judgments. Of course it is everyone's business, and he decides to speak or not. But do not lose a forum on this?

Samvel, I think that man (the artist) before there is a demand should weigh all the pros and cons and be ready for anyone, even negative reviews, but on the question: "are we entitled to criticize ? etc., but if the artist has addressed specifically to you with this issue, and not to art critics, maybe he knows to whom to contact and again to be ready for any response.

I believe that we must speak the truth, otherwise it will lose the meaning of the question, since he wants to know the truth, why you should be uncomfortable to say it?

How to respond? in fact even a negative response can be told in a gentle manner, besides you can always say it's your personal opinion and An opportunity of his other works seem shedevramu (but this is from psychology) and you can always naytichto something positive in at least people tried his hand at the same time, he gained experience that has already +, but that did not work out, so it was not his vocation, perhaps it will be very successful in other areas and will in future be obliged to you, do not lose time in vain, to get even more disappointments.
Besides, it is always a chance, ask someone else and then summarize the opinions.
Samvel, I think there should not be your problem, how to respond, and the one who asks all anyway not please