Authenticity Zvereva

[docent]

Good day!


Please comment on the authenticity of

73.7 h76, 2 cm

Oil on canvas

[redbor]

There is a bigger picture?

[docent]

Yes, please see the attachments

[redbor]

With A.Zverevym who's raberetsya?

The apparent fraud is not visible.
But in general, the portrait is not impressive.

Too easy.
In such a large canvas painted so few

[John Preston]

Сообщение от redbor

With A.Zverevym raberetsya who else?

Valery Stanislavovich Silayev supposed to A.Zverevym deal, as you know ...
<! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[Алек Сандер]

The probability of 90 percent, not animals.
Anatoly T., of course, loved his person, but not so much that the whole canvas izrisovyvat their initials.
Although, as I understand it, this is '86, and this year it could be anything.
But the signature does not look like very much.

[redbor]

Сообщение от John Preston

Valery Stanislavovich Silayev supposed to A.Zverevym deal, as you know ...

Well, yes, it is accepted to think so.

If the signature is Silaeva - Zvereva signature is not necessary.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

I think now we can believe in authorship A.Zvereva,
 
only if there is no doubt the origin of the picture.

[Балагур]

Good evening.
Somehow I do not feel there Zvereva: its richness, mellowness (who knows, he will understand), not in written Zverev.
Here, I have a feeling from this picture.
And for many of them "were" for fun <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Игорь Гурьев]

In general thing - very weak.

All the paint - on the surface, there is no relationship of colors (not even a color, just paint).

There is no slightest hint of depth of field picture.


If you are going to buy and interesting opinion, my opinion is simple: a dubious thing, would not advise.

[Мимопроходил]

Сообщение от docent

Good day!


Please comment on the authenticity of ...

Knock on this issue in a personal forumchanin to spigo.
I think nobody will be offended if I say that the opinion in matters of art by Igor Zverev povesomee will of the majority.
Good luck!