Authenticity Zvereva
 

Good day!


Please comment on the authenticity of

73.7 h76, 2 cm

Oil on canvas

There is a bigger picture?

Yes, please see the attachments

With A.Zverevym who's raberetsya?

The apparent fraud is not visible.
But in general, the portrait is not impressive.

Too easy.
In such a large canvas painted so few

Valery Stanislavovich Silayev supposed to A.Zverevym deal, as you know ...
<! - 6 ~ ~ ->

The probability of 90 percent, not animals.
Anatoly T., of course, loved his person, but not so much that the whole canvas izrisovyvat their initials.
Although, as I understand it, this is '86, and this year it could be anything.
But the signature does not look like very much.

Well, yes, it is accepted to think so.

If the signature is Silaeva - Zvereva signature is not necessary.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

I think now we can believe in authorship A.Zvereva,
 
only if there is no doubt the origin of the picture.

Good evening.
Somehow I do not feel there Zvereva: its richness, mellowness (who knows, he will understand), not in written Zverev.
Here, I have a feeling from this picture.
And for many of them "were" for fun <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

In general thing - very weak.

All the paint - on the surface, there is no relationship of colors (not even a color, just paint).

There is no slightest hint of depth of field picture.


If you are going to buy and interesting opinion, my opinion is simple: a dubious thing, would not advise.

Knock on this issue in a personal forumchanin to spigo.
I think nobody will be offended if I say that the opinion in matters of art by Igor Zverev povesomee will of the majority.
Good luck!