Archipenko.

[TUNER]

Please help me with an estimate of paintings Archipenko.
Oil on board, 60 x 40 cm Thank you.

[uriart]

TUNER, is a Archipenko, you Pope!

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от TUNER; 2008931"

Please help me with an estimate of paintings Archipenko . Oil on board, 60 x 40 cm

Dear TUNER. I assume that your fake by Archipenko fabricated with a similar fraud, which was once sold to a private person in Hungary. Unfortunately, nothing more to say you can not.

Then it was dated 1960, the size of 68h32 cm and was called Nu .

[TUNER]

uriart

Please do not be rude to begin with!


OlegTsi

Thank you for your reply.
The picture is not mine.
As for fakes, what grounds for this assertion?

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от TUNER; 2009181"

picture is not mine. As for fakes, what grounds for this assertion ?

It's very simple . Works very well studied Archipenko - this time.
For artistic and compositional qualities of this picture can not be compared with the works of Archipenko - that's two.
The original work of such a plan has its own history - that's three.
If it was a seminal work , it would be so easy to not get into this topic with a question :

Сообщение от TUNER; 2008931"

Please help me with an estimate of Archipenko picture

- that's four.

Yes, you yourself must see and understand.

[TUNER]

OlegTsi

Thank you for your detailed response, the logic is clear, the principle of "this can not be, because this can never happen."
Nevertheless, thank you, though not Nakhamu.

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от TUNER

You do not even Nakhamu.

Well, thank you for that.

Добавлено через 5 часов 22 минуты

Сообщение от TUNER; 2009261"

logic is clear , the principle of " this can not be, because this can never happen

You know , TUNER, this phrase , you spoiled me a bit of Friday's mood. After a good party , I have decided you More time to respond. No, here in the forum, I am not guided by this logic . I try to apply their knowledge and experience. So went back and decided to komryuteru you to prove their case in a more illustrative way.
Photo 1 - Your Picture
Photo 2 - the original "Woman with a Mirror " , 1916 .

Now, in essence your question :

Сообщение от TUNER; 2008931"

Please help me with an estimate of paintings

Price it - exactly what is the frame and canvas. Ksati to use the canvas again , the image must be washed off.

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от TUNER; 2009261"

logic is clear , the principle of " this can not be, because this can never happen

You know , TUNER, this phrase , you spoiled me a bit of Friday's mood. After a nice party, I finally decided to answer you again . No, here in the forum, I am not guided by this logic . I try to apply their knowledge and experience. So went back to computer , and you decided to prove their case more revealing way.
Photo 1 - Your Picture
Photo 2 - the original "Woman with a Mirror " , 1916, painted wood or metal , base - oil on cardboard .

is now a matter of fact your question :

Сообщение от TUNER; 2008931"

Please help me with an estimate of paintings

Evaluation pattern is this: it costs as much as is the frame and canvas. Ksati to use the canvas again , this is a terrible image even need to rinse.

Now you are convincing or not?

[uriart]

OlegTsi, the impression that you are making excuses to the author and subject.
I do not understand why you need it ?
He writes to me that I Nakhamu and Nakhamu did it to you .
Ungrateful is the case, explain the uncomprehending .
They believe that they have masterpieces , and you, your ( rinsing ) deprive them of these masterpieces.
I am inclined to think that let people see what they want to see!
And do not disappoint them !
And so he wrote (which he, as the Pope ), but only because falshakov inundated by Archipenko and Internet resources and lots of auctions and galleries.
It's disgusting to look at them , these fakes.

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от uriart

He wrote to me that I Nakhamu and Nakhamu did it to you.

I do not understand.
Why can not I?