Paperwork on the sale of paintings

[ConSferArt]

Hello!
I have a very important question for the knowledgeable people.

There Artist, it is seller, which also serves to a third party ( the commission ) K omitentom.

commission is selling a picture of artist, receives a percentage of it , and passes the rest of the cost of painting to the principal . That , in turn, - artist .

Attention . question . What documents are made with the Principal and to the commission for the artist ? Is the sales contract ? Is there something else?

I beg for advice from knowledgeable people . Very grateful in advance to any prompts.

If you put the question in the wrong topic , please specify . to what is correct.

[artcol]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

Hello!
I have a very important question for the knowledgeable people.

There Artist, it is seller, which also serves to a third party ( the commission ) K omitentom.

commission is selling a picture of artist, receives a percentage of it , and passes the rest of the cost of painting to the principal . That , in turn, - artist .

Attention . question . What documents are made with the Principal and to the commission for the artist ? Is the sales contract ? Is there something else?

I beg for advice from knowledgeable people . Very grateful in advance to any prompts.

If you put the question in the wrong topic , please specify . in a properly .

Committent and artist : agency contract with the right to entrust the sale to a third party .
The principal shall , and the commission : commission contract /agency .

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от artcol

The commission and the artist : agency contract with the right to entrust the sale to a third party .
The principal shall , and the commission : commission contract /agency .

Oh, no , I did not recognize him. They all signed the treaty . I'm wondering what you need to sign a deal to legitimize the fact of the buyer. It is clear that by the contract - an act , statement , receipt and TP. Important for me to make sure I did not miss .

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

I wonder what you need to sign a deal to legitimize the fact of the buyer.

You may be satisfied with the transaction at the notary's certification.

[artcol]

SC admits even oral form of the contract, although there limits on the amount of such transactions.

We can conclude the contract of sale, and to assure him of a notary.

In general, it is enough that the docking, certifying the fact of payment of the transaction, such as receipts of money.

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от artcol

CC acknowledges even the oral form of the contract , although there limits on the amount of such transactions.
We can conclude the contract of sale, and to assure him of a notary.
In general , it is enough that the docking , certifying the fact of payment of the transaction , such as receipts of money .

That is not even certified by a notary document will be quite a pertinent ?
Thank you!

[artcol]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

That is not even certified by a notary document will be quite a pertinent?

Thank you!

Yes.
A notary certify appropriate only if the issue is very serious, and should insure.
I do not think this is the case.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

That is not even certified by a notary document will be quite a pertinent?

It is simply written by hand and that would be "appropriate."
Only a little more details on all sides navpisyvayte there will not hurt.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

A little more details on all sides only navpisyvayte there will not hurt .

Yes , you can add a dokumentik ( to the second will be the seller ) that the buyer claims to the quality of the goods at the time of the transaction does not have a marketable product , etc. I do not know how they fit in with the law on consumer rights , but IMHO a piece of paper can not hurt. You never know , will break now and bring back as defective >