I would like to see ...

[Тютчев]

No further, as yesterday was closed my theme the strange explanation of one of the admins. Here is all the text:

Tiutchev, why start such threads? Peaceful dialogue and reasoned debate there. Participants in the discussion do not listen to each other. Then why?
Thread close.
PS.
At one America is to blame, others Putin - all everybody knows, then why argue.
Better the outcome of the Russian Week with such fervor piling would be.

Today one of the admins open this thread.

I have long been a strange feeling that the forum, in addition to the existing rules, there are some rules, which somehow kept secret. I wish all the same to clarify this issue. Specifically, on what basis the administration decides what topics are closed, and what is not? Are there any criteria about which we are active forum participants are not informed? Please understand it correctly, creating a quality theme takes time and effort. And so I would not want to spend both in vain.
I understand that the owners and administration of the site may have their own political views and preferences. There is nothing strange about it. Strange and unacceptable, in my opinion, is that as a result of the presence, in addition to the official rules, there are unwritten rules for assigning subjective people in uncomfortable and humiliating position. Well, for example, if in the rules of the forum would have been an official ban on the topics of in a negative light of U.S. policy, then I knew it would not have to spend time creating your own theme. And I would be relieved of that unpleasant feeling that occurs when someone who is able to manage my life (even in the virtual world), uses it for my humiliation. What is the humiliation, you ask? And I answer, the humiliation that they give you to understand, even if indirectly, that you are second-class people. We can do with you, whatever we want and whenever you want. Want banned, but we want to close the subject without any explanation of reasons or for reasons clearly frivolous. What are the rules? Forget it! Rules for Fools!

I always feel in this situation a little boy, with respect to which an adult, using the fact that he is strong, committed an injustice. The analogy with the helplessness of the child seems particularly appropriate here, because due to technical features of the forum, I can not answer adequately. Of course, in normal circumstances I would have known what to do ...

I would like to understand why my theme is provocative, and the topic of Gregory there? Why is my topic was closed, despite the fact that it lasted only days (btw, for those days it was visited by 400 people) and there was no conflict, except for those strange, but still generally innocent message of the local "gay specialist on all issues? Why does the admin decided that "calm dialogue and reasoned debate is not" when just a discussion of this topic is a calm and reasoned, unlike many other themes? How to understand the phrase, "the panelists do not listen to each other." How do you know when participants listen to each other, and when not? Why in other subjects "wrong" positions are simply removed, and this (not only) is closed? Frankly, I so often had occasion to observe the situation that a reasonable question, and not waste it taking to close those annoying? It's just a guess, but you will agree, is not baseless.

So, do not be simpler to replace what would have to play with us in the cat and mouse, and thereby create conflict situations, to score in the list of rules to those that can not be opened! Specify precisely which topics are forbidden to discuss in our forums!

And yet, I would not waste my time writing these texts, though shaped and described my situation would not be repeated here many times. I would even say it has become commonplace.

[Santa]

Originally Posted by Tiutchev

Why is my topic was closed , despite the fact that it lasted all night

Again comes to mind L. Filatov, with its Fedot Archer >

.. You have such a fool
On Saturday, Ali like ?
Shall I dolzhon Minister
Explain every little thing ?

To bad about the king
Do not people talking for nothing ,
Act strictly according to law
I mean the action - on the sly .. >

And if , seriously , all the while feeling " under the hood " or feel invisible eye <!--~ 10 " - >
I'm am trying to to get used to you , Tiutchev , is heavier ..
And, of course , it is quite humbling ..
Ce la vie >

[Vlasta]

Dear Tiutchev, maybe you should not treat it so seriously ? This is not a tragedy of universal scale, so do not worry . Here , for example , in another forum admin of my " former " because he bans me constantly , and every word makes him a strange reaction . So I would have because of this upset ... " Life - the game , and virtual life even more. Do not waste , please nerves unnecessarily . This is , believe me , not worth it . >

[Toinen]

In all my time online was not removed any of my messages ! Can I do something wrong? >

[color=#666686 " ]Posted 10 minutes[/color]

Originally Posted by Tiutchev

I always feel in this situation a little boy , with respect to which an adult , using the fact that he commits injustice is stronger

Tiutchev, refer to law enforcement agencies , what is happening to you can qualify for the Article 132 , Part 3 of the Criminal Code Violent acts ....

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Toinen

Tiutchev , contact the police, what is happening to you may be qualified under Article 132, Part 3 of the Criminal Code Violent acts

There are re-classified under the murky story " Propaganda or campaigning inciting social , racial , national or religious hatred and enmity . "
And cut dough with both .

On the other hand : " The Government of Honduras signed a decree temporarily banning freedom of speech and the right to protest . "
As this is symbolic .

[L-ana64110]

Admins are just ordinary people with their views and preferences and the forum they consider "their home" and we came to visit them to have fun.

As soon as we get tired of them-us "expelled."
I have an impression.

[Toinen]

Originally Posted by "L-ana64110

forum they consider" their home "and we came to visit them to have fun.

L-ana64110, let us not forget that this is a private resource (business)!

With regard to "come to have fun," then they should be called - "come to have fun."

In a strange monastery with its charter, not walk!

[Moriakoff]

Originally Posted by Tiutchev

I would like to understand why my theme is provocative, and the topic of Gregory there? Why is my topic was closed, despite the fact that it lasted only days (btw, for those days it was visited by 400 people) and there was no conflict, except for those strange, but still generally innocent message of the local "gay specialist on all issues?

I knew it! Noble blue blood was boiling volcano two days and finally followed by a challenge to a duel! >
But do not call prinimayu.Pochemu? Yes, because you yourself "weapon" damage!
Well, imagine the situation ... you and your faithful seconds Ika-Ika, 12metrov, pistols, well ... I concur! Since you are currently a brow cocked scratch or leg will turn up when we meet! And what do I do? First aid you have, or continue to duel? It, for such I do not agree!
And the reason for the call I do not understand. From your huge links-sheet, I realized that I needed to go somewhere in a foreign land to defend my "brothers" and it will bite the throat enemies, thus strengthening the statehood of my motherland!
Protiff! I'm much more interested in my country and here, including the theme from Budanov, from which you discuss with your inherent intelligence uvilnul.

[Toinen]

Originally Posted by "Fed

On the other hand:" The Government of Honduras signed a decree temporarily banning freedom of speech and the right to protest. "

As this is symbolic.

Protest - on Manezhku!
And here we have gathered quite a different matter, you are our bitter!

[Fed]

Originally Posted by "Toinen

In a strange monastery with its charter, not walk!

Here Tiutchev and asks what this statute is.

A Toinen, as I understand it, believes that private business can also violate their rules.
This Novorussky approach.