Examination of works of Russian and foreign painting and graphics XVI-XX centuries.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Artem; 1462211"

Absolutely not agree with you, the experts responsible for the examination which they are pursuing. Just need to give them to court. And no matter ssylatsya on Preobrazhensky

Artem, all this was discussed more than once :"... experts are not legally liable for the correctness of the attribution, as it is interpreted as their scientific and informed opinion, and not a statement ... " (http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=84111) meaning to sue? "Yes, in court and will not accept such a statement, perhaps you're a lawyer, you know better. But for the last 15-20 years there was no precedent.

[Artem]

Post Eugene. All of this was discussed more than once :"... experts are not legally liable for the correctness of the attribution, as it is interpreted as their scientific and informed opinion, and not a statement ... " (http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=84111) meaning to sue? "Yes, in court and will not accept such a statement, perhaps you're a lawyer, you know better. But for the last 15-20 years there was no precedent.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------
I followed your advice deleted the message - A brief comment on the legal regulation of expert activity.as useless.
With regard to article to which you refer to - Konstantin Azadovsky: Russian Museum against Benoit. I have more information about it. Things might be different.
  You're absolutely right - there were no precedents. (Liability of experts) and not be discussed in court moglo.Nezhelanie poryake and Preveli to such results. Sorry for the time spent - Brief comment on the legal regulation of expert activity. " In any case, thanks for the feedback on my work useless.

[Artem]

Today Center of Grabar received notification from the Ministry of Culture, cease issuing assessments on a commercial basis on behalf of the state.
agencies.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Artem; 1494751 '

Today the center Grabar behalf of the Ministry of Culture received a notice of termination issuing assessments on a commercial basis on behalf of the state.
institutions.

Organize at the Center for a private examination, as in the Tretyakov Gallery.

[Тихая Сапа]

Amendment NINE them.
Tretyakov's not at the Tretyakov Gallery and quite successfully yuzayut grabarevskih and all the other experts.
Sense to create a new private examination?
All those customers want to come in NINE without the formation of a new office.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Silent Sapa

The point of creating a new private examination?
All those customers want to come in NINE without the formation of a new office.

Ah, yes ...

Yes.
Agreed.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от "Silent Sapa

successfully yuzayut grabarevskih and all the other experts.

Who knows what kind of slang?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

Who knows what kind of slang?

And that, yuzayut has already entered into the language of Antiquaries.
For example, yuzanny Gardner.


We are all in internet user.

[Тихая Сапа]

I apologize for the jargon. Costs of communicating with the younger generation of the technical intelligentsia.

But still curious situation. The only government agency provdyaschim examination was VNIIR? or the ban also touched?

It's funny that of all forms of control over antique market Ministry of Culture chose the path of withdrawal from the market and reduce their influence.

Although it can lobby the owners of private enterprises such as expert and NINE Artkonsaltinga. But this would mean that there is a clear head, capable of sober reflection and collective action, and it is difficult for me to believe. As a rule, in our area people are either able to analyze or to collective action.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

Who knows what kind of slang?

Learn how you are in the subject language of Russian Internet:

Test of Internet slang.