Single feature ranking

[Ольга Озолина]

Hello, dear colleagues!
In this forum, frequently asked questions about the directory, "One Art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/index.htm

I think that would be helpful if I will participate in the forum and to the best of their abilities and rights (a very limited <!--~ 2 "-"), executive secretary of the Rating center of trade unions of artists will answer your questions.

Surely you have and suggestions on the ratings of artists. I undertake to transmit to destination in the rating area with necessary comments.

The only request: to clothe and supply issues in a civilized form "But I thought that rudeness on this forum is not <!--~ There is 1 ~ ->

Here are some basic options:
Guidelines for determining the rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm
Archived:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ4.htm
The new project "International art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
Internet project "10000 best artists in the world" (based on the ratings):
http://painters.artunion.ru/best.htm

[Тютчев]

Olga Ozolin, this issue was already raised at the forum. Maybe it makes sense to combine the two themes into one with a broader context, ie discuss this topic has not a single "unified artistic rating, while all the ratings, which fall into the hands? Comparing the different ratings, you can more effectively identify their particular strengths and weaknesses.

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

Olga Ozolin, , this issue was already raised at the forum . Maybe it makes sense to combine the two themes into one with a broader context, ie discuss this topic has not a single "unified artistic rating, while all the ratings, which fall into the hands? Comparing the different ratings, you can more effectively identify their particular strengths and weaknesses.

The tone of discussion in the topic does not suit me. I was not interested in general opinions about the EXP, had heard for 11 years and praises, and curses, and slander ((((
EXP is already in the institutes are held, what is the point to discuss it in general?

Just if something can be useful in the sense of explaining some specific things, glad to help.

[danvik]

Explain please what downgrades artists?

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от danvik

explain please what downgrades artists?

Go to site artnet relations have not, but about a downgrade there are 2 reasons.

1-I: the artist is losing popularity. This does not happen within a year, but over the decade is even felt. Example: Many of the sixties, which in the wake of perestroika, were built almost in the rank of classics, and now have taken a completely normal place in the second row. And many full members of the Arts, which after death are forgotten by the public immediately, and experts, too, unless the profile (well, not writing, for example. An art of social realism, so he will remember this artist, unless recalled).

However, with categories A and B. Which of metamorphosis with many artists come, and the most famous! Than it was 30 years ago and what was ... (Not naming names because I'm here are not under the nickname, and no right to offend anyone). Market relations, understand (((((
And our perception is changing. Its very interesting to older releases EXP track itself is sometimes notice))

2-I am the cause. In the history of EXP were several serious global revisions, the last one was in connection with the creation of MHR:
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
When the rankings came Picasso and Tiepolo, a lot had to be revised. And by the way, this is a whole, in my meniyu, went EXP benefit.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от "Olga Ozolina

When a rating appeared Picasso and Tiepolo

They must have received a category "5 G".

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от dedulya37

They must have received a category "5 G".

This joke has been more years 11ti))))

Was still a wonderful poem Meylanda on a similar theme:

ON THE OCCASION ratings of old and new MASTERS
XVIII-XX centuries

Commemoration of the Dead -
Good work, gentlemen.
None of them really do not vozropschet,
They do not harm the rating.

But about the living, is perhaps worth
Check all a hundred times,
Not something like an animal, the creator of howl,
Or, as a child, the tears from my eyes

Dip mournful page
Where he is mentioned in the "6-B,
And it is no doubt
In his tragic fate.

(2000)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Olga Ozolin, he has a lot of ranking.

artist's life is harsh,

Gallery owner went "cool" ...

Rating - a true basis

To trade beauty! (c)

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

the joke has been more 11ti years ))))

Honestly, I thought that it was I quipped.
But now we have proved that thought is material and it is somewhere traveling just now flew into my head.


Look to the category of Malevich through 100 years of commercials.

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Honestly, I thought that it was I quipped. But now we have proved that thought is material and it is somewhere traveling just now flew into my head.
Look to the category of Picasso's commercials after 100 years.

I remember the first time a "T" (only with a higher figure because it was about a famous artist), we heard from Margarita Hook, so that the authorship of the joke belongs to her)))

With regard to category Picasso in 100 years: I remember we were once at a meeting RC said that would be nice to play this game: imagine that we live in, for example, during the Stasova or Tugendholda and is EXP)))) Of course, all was not before, but the game would have turned out interesting!

I give the idea of forum users))))